this forum should be closed due to lack of posts

i think subsim resources would be better served if this forum was deleted and its threads were combined with the regular sh4 mod forum because this forum often goes days or in some cases a week without seeing a single post

the sh4 mods forum is predominently all ubm 1.5 mods anyway so this forum has lost its need IMHO

[Task Force]

Thats gona change once GWX 4.0 is released, This part of the fourm was created so to resolve the issue between the ATO modders and the PTO modders. Remember Neals reminder thread.

[Sledgehammer427]

yeah...once GWX4 comes out...we'll need it..buggy

[Orion2012]

Perhaps not closed but combined with the ATO thread?

Originally Posted by Sledgehammer427

yeah...once GWX4 comes out...we'll need it..buggy

And by that you mean?
:hmm:

Other then that?
This thread should be closed.

While we are at closeing Forums?
Shouldn't other forums here at SubSim be closed by the stated standard?
Look at the Forum list!
This is still a more posted to then others.
Should those be shut down also as a 'waste'?

[Jimbuna]

Originally Posted by Sledgehammer427

yeah...once GWX4 comes out...we'll need it..buggy

....and so it goes on and on and on and on and

Spectemur Agendo

[Alex]

@ Neal & the mods : So what are you doing ?
Mr Webster is not happy cause he thinks this forum doesn't deserve its place !
Please ensure the appropriate action is taken ! :p

[ReallyDedPoet]

Originally Posted by Task Force

Thats gona change once GWX 4.0 is released, This part of the fourm was created so to resolve the issue between the ATO modders and the PTO modders. Remember Neals reminder thread.

Yeah this ^^^.

And because of that there will be no forum deletion, maybe this thread, but not the forum. Let's move on here folks, no need to get the popcorn out


RDP

Please lock this thread kind Sir!!

Originally Posted by Alex

@ Neal & the mods : So what are you doing ?
Mr Webster is not happy cause he thinks this forum doesn't deserve its place !
Please ensure the appropriate action is taken ! :p

my thread does not warrant any action, but your response to it sure might


as "Task Force" said, it will be used to deal with "mod" conflicts between ATO mods and PTO mods that need to be resolved.

maybe renaming it to "ATO and PTO Mods Conflicts" would better identify what it is intended for.

by naming it "SH4 UBM Add-on" its purpose is not that easy to understand which is one of the main reasons i could see no need for it and looking at the "last post" dates on the forum you can see it was very seldom used.

@ RDP maybe it would be a good idea to just lock this thread and let it "go away"
that way it wont pop up one day and cause further missunderstanding about it.

[Jimbuna]

Originally Posted by WEBSTER

@ RDP maybe it would be a good idea to just lock this thread and let it "go away"
that way it wont pop up one day and cause further missunderstanding about it.

Agreed

[ReallyDedPoet]

Originally Posted by WEBSTER

@ RDP maybe it would be a good idea to just lock this thread and let it "go away"
that way it wont pop up one day and cause further missunderstanding about it.

If I could ( SH3 is my territory ) I would have earlier, I was hoping my post would quell the drama. But I have sent along a few messages concerning this ( there were no SH4 Mods on earlier ).

In the mean time let's play nice here folks and move along


RDP

I would love to bow to your wishs.
But I see no results!

Do what you want.
Say what you want.

But don't kid a kidder!!!

[Mush Martin]

did somebody just say Baboo outloud.

Dont nobody make me come out of retirement here.

P.S. Hi all if we are using the posting frequency argument
to dissect subsim then why dont we post the thread under
its proper title.

I am critical of subsim and could run it better if everybody thought
like me.

welcome to the new world try to find some space for yourself in here.

M

[Mush Martin]

everybody thats posted on this thread is a friend of mine even the OP

stop it all of you.