Silent Hunter 5 Announced?

[scrapser]

Originally Posted by mapuc

One thing that could make me very happy. Is a
destroyer command-like-game. Where you on the startscreen can choose wheither you like to play in SHIII or in SHIV.

Markus

Way, way, waaaayyyyy back in the day. MicroProse announced they were working on a companion sim for Silent Service. Keep in mind this was for the Amiga (rest in peace) titled, "Destroyer Command" if I remember correctly. The idea was to somehow have it recognize and launch the necessary Silent Service program files so one player could operate the sub while the other player operated the escort.

Unfortunately the Commodore/Amiga man in charge was busy making horrible marketing decisions which ended in bankruptcy. I have a DVD of a video taken by one of the Commodore Amiga employees as he toured the facility interviewing everyone on their last day at work (summer 1993). It's pretty sad considering what he shows they were working on in R&D including a CD drive way ahead of PC's. The Amiga was a good 10 years ahead of PC's and giving Apple a good run for its money. I might add the Amiga OS (circa 1986) looks an awful lot like Windows 3.0 (or is it the other way around?).

I digress. Silent Service (for the Commodore 64 in 1984) was developed in the United States which is likely why it covered the Pacific theater and in my opinion is the father of all sub sims. That's what we need here, another US based development house to pick up the torch.

[FIREWALL]

Originally Posted by Roads88

I've been watching this thread for some time. I (and I seem to stand alone) have had enough of German U boats and American fleet boats.

I'm ready for a cold war sim. Something like Red Storm Rising II.

If I want to run the boats in the first paragraph. I all ready have the sims.
I just can't see buying another. It would have to be something that wood really knock my socks off.

Runnig boats from both sides of the cold war would be great.

Think what it would be like taking an old Russian Whiskey out looking for trouble.

What your looking for is a fantasy\ arcade sim.

[mapuc]

Originally Posted by scrapser

Way, way, waaaayyyyy back in the day. MicroProse announced they were working on a companion sim for Silent Service. Keep in mind this was for the Amiga (rest in peace) titled, "Destroyer Command" if I remember correctly. The idea was to somehow have it recognize and launch the necessary Silent Service program files so one player could operate the sub while the other player operated the escort.

Unfortunately the Commodore/Amiga man in charge was busy making horrible marketing decisions which ended in bankruptcy. I have a DVD of a video taken by one of the Commodore Amiga employees as he toured the facility interviewing everyone on their last day at work (summer 1993). It's pretty sad considering what he shows they were working on in R&D including a CD drive way ahead of PC's. The Amiga was a good 10 years ahead of PC's and giving Apple a good run for its money. I might add the Amiga OS (circa 1986) looks an awful lot like Windows 3.0 (or is it the other way around?).

I digress. Silent Service (for the Commodore 64 in 1984) was developed in the United States which is likely why it covered the Pacific theater and in my opinion is the father of all sub sims. That's what we need here, another US based development house to pick up the torch.

Great reading, I must say, didn't knew all that.

Well Maybe you haven't heard of it, or you forgot all about it, when you wrote the story above. I was thinking of a Ubisofts Destroyer Command-like-game or whatever you would call it.

Markus

[Frederf]

Based on my experience with the Silent Hunter line of games I would posit the "natural conclusion." I have to agree that while a "modern nuclear" sim would be natural it should be avoided as the technology is too advanced and would be unsatisfying since SH hasn't even gotten WWII tech right.

• Global scope

1. 3000BC to 3000AD. Limiting the time via hard coding makes absolutely no sense. Let the campaigns determine the stop and start dates. Even if the base game is '41 to 45, having flexibility never hurts.
2. Every drop of water on the planet. Make allowances to map water environment for all points on the globe. The Arctic, Pacific, and Atlantic all look different so build your game to match. Use map "painting" techniques along with procedurally generated distance-offshore/depth algorithms to produce the sea color with blending for zone transitions.
3. Weather. Again manually "paint" the world with typical weather patterns for every month or season and let a blending happen so for a given location the probability values for weather would be averaged between the defined values at the adjacent time points. Implement a diurnal weather cycle as well.
4. Round Earth. The Earth is round in reality and thus it should be in the game. This makes 1:1 almanac values for the sun and moon much easier. Distances can match real life values. Develop point to point visual displays where you drag your course line out and it actually curves on the map due to the projection method. The local rendered attack "stage" might remain flat. Also nix all those pesky bugs when crossing the IDL.
5. Units. Don't assume anything about what units are going to be used in the game. Go ahead and program the game in meters and seconds but let the campaign and submarine configs define exactly what units are used. Seeing the map scale read weird numbers of nm because they are hardcoded to be round numbers of km (converted) is just shameful.

• Submarine Systems

1. Failures and misalignments. Mechanical problems are some of the most significant and interesting issues faced by submarines. Lost an engine, mistakenly poured 1000 lbs of diesel over the side, SD radar out of commission for a day, periscope flooded. When you read patrol reports you get a feeling of how much of being a submariner was occupied and defined by this. Depth charging should have a tiny chance of death and a large chance of small failures.
2. Sound. The hydrophone and sonar stations are cartoons of their real life selves. Recreate the speed/noise penalty. Give tick noises to pings. Allow people to prop turn count. Make a random squeak in merchant propellers. Give frequency filter adjustments as well as a volume knob.
3. Radar. Similar upgrades here, range, miscalibration, proper output (range counter, A-scope knob), radar cross section, terrain reflection, other radar interference. Sensors that gives range and no bearing or bearing and no range or just presence should be easy.
4. Engines. Give advanced control over engines, edit what ahead std. 2/3rds, etc equate to, differential propulsion, which engines are online, which shafts are online, battery use on the surface. Go ahead and hide it from the new players and give an easy interface but control over the boat is just as important as flight controls in a flight sim.
5. Radio. Model encrypting/decrypting delays. Direction-finding for intercepting transmissions. Fix the simplistic system where you are playing stored audio files when you should be having realtime-tied reception. Load up on gramaphone records in base based on if it was available yet. Give volume, track, shuffle, etc commands for the radio and the gramaphone.
6. Periscope. Stadimeter both directions. Can only view when the eyepiece is reachable. Murky water. Light gatering difference based on apature.

• Map and Navigation

1. Option for manual or navigation officer ownship plotting with uncertainty based on weather, submergence, sunrise, sunset.
2. Map marking expanded to draw various symbols (ship, ship sunk, airplane, etc), one of which has to be a current-timestamped "X."

• TDC and Plotting

1. Make it a teamwork or crew affair. Have a dialogue box that can mark the attack plot (navmap tools) with a mark based on user/crew-generated bearing/range/time information.
2. Make sure any periscope-TDC ties are functioning.

• Crew Function and Standard Operating Procedures
  1. Replicate the function, limitations, and mistakes of their real life counterparts.
  2. Have settable "alarms" for various crew like "Reduce TC to 1x and give alert when this tracked contact is at 270 bearing." or "Alert when warship contact closes to medium range." This is stuff you could say to a person and it would be easy.
  3. Track any contact specified. Tracking should only update information that changes for brevity. Why would a sonarman tell me "Closing!" every time? Give any sensor the ability to track, radar, visual.
  4. "Drills" during patrol like set up an SOP to ":00 90' dive, :10 ahead 1/3rd, :20 surface, raise radar antenna, radar 1 scan and off, 2:30 repeat" so I can do regular sonar dives on 3 hour intervals while on patrol for days on end without having to micromanage. Have a "Drills" page where you can drag various simple functions from a library together into long drills that can be executed 1 through infinity times when enacted. This would be powerful.

[fireship4]

Good list, though sadly I'm not sure how much (if any!? ) of these things will be implemented.

If only they left more of the code open to modding - by the power of Greyskull we could work such wonders! And they would of course benefit...

[mookiemookie]

Originally Posted by Frederf

• 1. "Drills" during patrol like set up an SOP to ":00 90' dive, :10 ahead 1/3rd, :20 surface, raise radar antenna, radar 1 scan and off, 2:30 repeat" so I can do regular sonar dives on 3 hour intervals while on patrol for days on end without having to micromanage. Have a "Drills" page where you can drag various simple functions from a library together into long drills that can be executed 1 through infinity times when enacted. This would be powerful.

YES! I've always wanted to set up a standing orders type thing to handle hydrophone checks and whatnot.

[Undefined]

I would want some Eye Candy aswell, like you can roam every section of the submarine etc.

[Blood_splat]

I want to be able to play the role of a mess cook.

[Kloef]

If the release schedule is at Q1/2009

Stop living in the past:rotfl:

[tomoose]

......the thread that refuses to die!!!!

[DigitalAura]

Nice! ETA 2010... I'm giddy with anticipation. It says all new code... and Uboats in the Atlantic! So... it's not a modern sub game. That's good news!

[Sailor Steve]

@ DigitalAura: :rotfl:That is a great sig!

[tater]

A really good sub sim requires adding some things missing from SH4/etc.

Currents, more fidelity for underwater terrain, better AI, more detailed damage models (progressive fires, damage control for ships, etc), a proper spherical world with the right horixzon distances for spotting, weather that varies by location (squalls you can sail into or out of, variable winds and directions, etc).

Interestingly, surface warfare is a special case of submarine warfare. Any engine that does subs really well, can also do surface warfare well. And for any time period.

Think about it.

The best engine would therefore allow them to do add on for surface warfare—ww1, ww2, modern, heck, ANCIENT would be possible. This is all with stuff that would make the next gen SS great. Sailing would require a sailing model, and I'd pay money for that, too.

Bottom line is that a really good engine would allow, well, any naval stuff you could wish to see as add-ons/mods with some decent fidelity.

[DigitalAura]

Originally Posted by Sailor Steve

@ DigitalAura: :rotfl:That is a great sig!

Thanks! I took a still from "JAWS" and added a sub pic I googled..added a rolling surf, and sky, and altered colours a tad for uniformity.

[fireship4]

Yeah I laughed when I saw it on the thread too, good job.