SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
11-17-15, 04:23 PM | #1 |
Nub
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 3
Downloads: 1
Uploads: 0
|
Radar warning
Hi,
How should I adjust Metox radar warning sensor so that it only detects aircraft radar, not radar used by destroyers . I already tried adjusting the MinHeight value, but then rw did not work at all. Thanks! |
11-17-15, 06:10 PM | #2 | |
Gefallen Engel U-666
|
welcome aboard!
rtr82! I'm confused by the question; the metox could only detect Air-to-surface radar from Allied aircraft...aircraft for use as the MkII "1½-metre ASV
Quote:
__________________
"Only two things are infinite; The Universe and human squirrelyness; and I'm not too sure about the Universe" Last edited by Aktungbby; 11-17-15 at 06:22 PM. |
|
11-17-15, 06:35 PM | #3 |
Nub
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 3
Downloads: 1
Uploads: 0
|
Hi, Aktungbby
Yes, Metox could only detect air-to-surface radar, but in SH3 it detects both, aircraft and destroyer radar. So is there way to adjust that sensor so that it does not detect destroyer radar, only aircraft? |
11-17-15, 10:06 PM | #4 |
Navy Seal
|
rtr82 is right, it does detect both.
__________________
"Some ships are designed to sink...others require our assistance." Nathan Zelk |
11-18-15, 08:02 AM | #5 |
Chief of the Boat
|
Rgr that.
I'm not aware of any current fix.
__________________
Wise men speak because they have something to say; Fools because they have to say something.
Oh my God, not again!! GWX3.0 Download Page - Donation/instant access to GWX (Help SubSim) |
11-18-15, 08:54 AM | #6 |
Sea Lord
|
In the sensors.dat file there should be values for metox radar. Have a look at the min height values. They should be higher than stock.
|
11-20-15, 05:08 PM | #7 |
Nub
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 3
Downloads: 1
Uploads: 0
|
|
11-21-15, 06:57 AM | #8 |
Ace of the Deep
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: France
Posts: 1,072
Downloads: 155
Uploads: 0
|
Why was the Metox not able to detect radar signals from destroyers ?
|
12-20-15, 01:30 PM | #9 |
The Old Man
|
Because surface ship radars operate on different frequencies, have different sweep rates, different sweep heights, different pulse repetition rates, different pulse width, etc....all of which makes them very different from radars installed in aircraft. Like all detection devices, METOX could only "see" what it was looking for and its designers didn't know everything that they needed to design it to look for...
|
01-10-16, 10:15 PM | #10 |
Planesman
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 191
Downloads: 50
Uploads: 0
|
The french Metox R600 had a bandwith from 0,65m to 2,65m. Together with its first interim "biscay cross" antenna it could detect signals from 1,2m to 1,8m, no matter from where they had been emitted. E.g. not only airbased ASV MkI and MkII were within this range, but also ship based meter radar types 286 and 290/291 (1,4m, both simulated in SH3). Also the american meter radar type SC (1,36m, also included in SH3) could be detected.
The original range of Metox was 10-12km with biscay cross antenna and up to 18km with later Bali antenna (0,75m-3,00m) against planes or ships. Land based radar sets could be detected at up to 100km. The original value in SH3 (4.000m) is much to less and does not represent the effectiveness of that rwr. An early fine-tuning was done by Stiebler in his "radar detection mod" from 2005. You may read the included description. |
01-11-16, 01:49 PM | #11 |
Ace of the Deep
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,138
Downloads: 147
Uploads: 12
|
Hi,
the main problem with RWRs in SH3 is that different wavelengths are not modeled, i.e., Metox also detects cm radar sets At the time Metox entered service ships already used cm radars. It would be great to know how many ships carried cm and how many ships carried m radar sets in '42. Regards, LGN1 |
01-13-16, 02:34 AM | #12 |
Planesman
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 191
Downloads: 50
Uploads: 0
|
Hi LGN1,
yes, this is true. In SH3, none of the RWR sets differentiate between wavelengths. Some time ago, h.sie and Stiebler tried to create a workaround for this, where the range of the Metox was reduced time by time, using the SH3 Commander´s abilities. There were some estimates about the efficiency, then puplished in h.sie´s thread. From what we can read in different internet resources, the type 271 decimeter set was ordered 350 times and equipped at 236 ships by the sommer of 1942 (more ore less every escort ship, I assume). But there should be many other ships equipped with meter radar at that time. We can read about many observations of meter signals from ships with the Metox apparatus. On the other hand, we can read about at least one operator which only have searched in the ASV band (around 170cm), not in the ship´s radar band (130-140cm) with his Metox, obviously because he didn´t consider the ships as a letal threat (see www.uboatarchive.net). |
01-13-16, 03:53 PM | #13 |
Ace of the Deep
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,138
Downloads: 147
Uploads: 12
|
Hi Leitender,
thanks for the information! Do you have some links with reports about ship detection by metox? I could never find such reports and would be very much interested. I'm wondering why the KM never (at least to my knowledge) wanted to use RWR for shadowing ships/convoys (at least in SH3 this works great :-) ). Best, LGN1 |
01-15-16, 02:20 AM | #14 | |||
Planesman
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 191
Downloads: 50
Uploads: 0
|
Hi LGN1,
in interrrogation reports of survivors or in "KTB"s (after action reports), beginning from August, 1942 at www.uboatarchive.net, you may find many notes about the "FUMB" called RWR. E.g. here: http://www.uboatarchive.net/KTB160-3.htm Search for "detection" (in this case, radar detection is meant. The german term is "Ortung" for radar detection). At 04.11.42 you will find Quote:
Quote:
The interrogation report of the radio operator mentioned in my earlier post can be found here: http://www.uboatarchive.net/U-517INT.htm In Chapter IX, "GERMAN SEARCH RECEIVER" you will also find a table about some known wavelengths: Quote:
Frank |
|||
01-15-16, 02:33 AM | #15 |
Planesman
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 191
Downloads: 50
Uploads: 0
|
None of the german RWR could give a range, and barely a bearing (round dipole "Bali" not at all, later "Athos" round detectors were splitted into quadrants), so the commanders couldn´t use the RWR for homing purposes. It was a just a warning device.
I wonder how you manage to shadow convoys with a RWR in SH3, because information about range or bearing isn´t given by the Metox either and theres is only a written warning, no audible warning by the crew (big disadvantage!) - and this warning only comes one time. The player cannot order the radio operator to repeat or to follow the contact. Maybe you use the radar instead? With it, shadowing is possible, but even the radar was used as a warning mean. Due to the fear of beeing homed in on own radar signals, the radar was often switched off near enemy vessels or convoys. |
|
|