|
|
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997
|
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
04-12-07, 02:00 PM
|
#136 |
|
Rear Admiral
 Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Swindon, England
Posts: 10,151
Downloads: 35
Uploads: 0
|
 wow a post after a year and a half dead
|
|
|
|
04-12-07, 02:36 PM
|
#137 |
|
Engineer
 Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Kansas City, KS
Posts: 203
Downloads: 10
Uploads: 0
|
Eh its easier to do..
I do it a different way for Sh4...much easier
__________________
"Be my friend or be a mushroom cloud."~If I was President...Iran would have a nuke...they just wouldnt like the delivery method... <AHREF="http://www.subsim.com/radioroom/showthread.php?t=120621"_blank">JSGME Quick Reference</A> Major US ARMY RANGERS 1985-2003 |
|
|
|
|
04-12-07, 02:53 PM
|
#138 | |
|
Rear Admiral
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Swindon, England
Posts: 10,151
Downloads: 35
Uploads: 0
|
Quote:
It was all hexediting the changes
|
|
|
|
|
|
04-12-07, 07:32 PM
|
#139 |
|
Silent Hunter
  Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 4,585
Downloads: 297
Uploads: 0
|
Well, the Renown project is dead, in any case. I don't want to release a vessel that's basically a crude edit of the existing KGV class, especially when certain other modelers have created superbly detailed warships like the "Lutzow" and "Graf Zeppelin". Also, SH3 and SH4 need cargo vessels much more than heavy units. If I ever release any warships it will probably be some allied cruisers - the HMAS "Sydney" (70-75% complete and on hiatus), the USS "New Orleans" (not yet started), and the USS "Atlanta" (20% complete and likely to be discarded & restarted).
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
