SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
04-03-13, 07:39 PM | #91 | ||
Silent Hunter
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 4,404
Downloads: 29
Uploads: 0
|
Quote:
But to steer back to the original topic..... Quote:
Because welfare is not something that you are required to apply for, but can (as the roughly 1600 Florida applicants chose to do) remove yourself voluntarily from the process, I do not see where the problem is. I mean sure, if everyone was required to apply for welfare benefits, sure that would be an invasion of privacy. But since application is a voluntary process, what is the legal difference? I recall Mookie talked about it being "insurance". Ok - lets say you have a life insurance policy - and you OD on illegal drugs and die. If your insurance policy has a clause (as many do) that refuse to pay out if death was due to an illegal activity - or even specify drug use - they are not going to pay. They require a death certificate - and if the cert says the cause of death was a drug overdose, you can bet the beneficiary (s) won't see a dime. That is legal. Drug screenings are legal in insurance claims when its for benefits. So why is a claim on "social" insurance somehow "special"?
__________________
Good Hunting! Captain Haplo |
||
|
|