SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
|
06-25-17, 07:14 AM | #1 |
Swabbie
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 10
Downloads: 236
Uploads: 0
|
Web sites and videos russian on Youtube on this submarine. After comparing its speed varies from 41 to 45 noeuds, then be aware that there are two classes of Alfa I and II. I've been testing the maneuverability and power with Cold Waters. At this speed in depth it corresponds well to what is said of him. Capable of avoiding a torpedo very grabde speed. A submarine that turns very quickly. Of course he does not avoid all the torpedoes, but that is his advantage. |
06-25-17, 07:58 AM | #2 |
Medic
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Somewhere
Posts: 167
Downloads: 78
Uploads: 0
|
I would take the russian videos with a grain fo salt. The russians are known to inflate some data to make stuff look better.
|
06-25-17, 08:08 AM | #3 | |
Ocean Warrior
|
Quote:
My guess would be that he is using outdated cold war era data, especially on things like dive depth, because back then the assumption was that titanium was used to improve dive depth, not to make hull lighter.
__________________
Grumpy as always. |
|
06-25-17, 08:01 AM | #4 | |
Ocean Warrior
|
Quote:
Where did you find out the difference between pr.705 and pr.705K (and I generously assume that you use Alfa-I and Alfa-II designations to destinguish between the two) in terms of speed? As far as I am aware: - you got the dive depths (рабочая and предельная) - you got the speeds wrong (though you did correct yourself later, in reality the 41knot speed was not usable outside of trials and the subs never exceeded 39 knots) - you got the number of turbines wrong (as far as I am aware both pr.705 and pr.705K use the same turbine - ГТЗА ОК-7)
__________________
Grumpy as always. |
|
|
|