Index of Stickied topics + RA Mod Discussion here

[p7p8]

Originally Posted by MANoWAR.U52

So if you go to PD +/- 2 meters to do a check and by accident any ASW plane flies in a radius of 7.5nm no matter what facing, what (stormy) weather or if night, you´re detected 100% in an instant 0.1 seconds. Wether you have your masts out or not.

Nope. Don't be so touchy :P
You should to watch again your own video and you will see most of your conclusions doesn't reflect reality.

BTW this information is in RA readme (in RA 1.41 section)

58 - Onboard Special Forces - now you can launch it below 1 meter (3 ft) periscope depth. *
Periscope depth - a dangerous level. If the sub is at periscope depth, even with lowered masts - it can be detected at a considerable distance LADAR sensor, or VISUAL sensor in a very short range.

Advice for all new DW players:
Please read RA manuals - weapon guide and !DWX_RA_1_XX_OPFOR_INFO before you report "bug" on forum.

[MANoWAR.U52]

Says the guy that comes to channels desperately spamming his promotion links.

These videos are provided as feedback to help make the game or mod better as I am pretty sure that a ASW airplane spawning right on your head right at the beginning of the mission is neither intended nor described in your beloved manual papers there. I want to keep other users there from reloading and wasting their time like with the Ohio Mission or the Bear Campaign that doesn´t give the radio message in case of turned off Link.


Also I dont need to rewatch my video because everything I stating is exactly happening there. If you see things different fine by me. I perceive this magic detection system as broken and still do it. Don´t need your arrogant go read the manual advice there.

If you can´t stand reading this, well than you´re the touchy one and simply should skip my posts as they are not intended solely for you self-appointed RA moderator here.


Problem with the Land Strike scenario, a CTD happens exactly when the video finishes. Different LAM point settings (1,4, and 5) were tried, still resulting in a crash when impacting.




@Jaf I´ve read your message and link was turned of in my playthrough.

[p7p8]

Originally Posted by MANoWAR.U52

Says the guy that comes to channels desperately spamming his promotion links.

Are you serious? If "yes" it means you are just jealousy

My videos are mostly directed to players who participated in a particular battle. Rest is for testing (mainly not public - for RA developers, some for DW community) and sometimes (smallest %) from my single player games - just for fun.

Originally Posted by MANoWAR.U52

These videos are provided as feedback to help make the game or mod better (...)

wrong!
These videos are proof - you did NOT read manuals :P

Originally Posted by MANoWAR.U52

...as I am pretty sure that a ASW airplane spawning right on your head right at the beginning of the mission is neither intended nor described in your beloved manual papers there.

Screen from mission editor - the same scenario:



You were unlucky, so please - stop crying
BTW this mission should be played on Victor II, but you have chosen LADA - best (ultra modern) SSK for Russians :P
..and you failed :P

Originally Posted by MANoWAR.U52

I want to keep other users there from reloading and wasting their time like with the Ohio Mission...

Ohio missions in campaign works fine - without any bugs.

Originally Posted by MANoWAR.U52

Don´t need your arrogant go read the manual advice there.

and:

Originally Posted by MANoWAR.U52

Problem with the Land Strike scenario, a CTD happens exactly when the video finishes:

But your next video with launching LAM's proved you sill didn't read weapons manual (missiles explodes in 1/4 way- typical wrong LAM settings ) and probably this fact caused CTD.

I know - real DW master like you don't need to read anything - all bad things are always someone else fault

[MANoWAR.U52]

There is absolutely nothing that you exert one could be jealous at, the opposite is true: feeling sorry.

The Ohio campaign was fixed with the hotfix patch #1. People simply can check the post history here to see it is the truth, you yourself posted the hotfix link. I also understand why this ASW detection is happening because of the Nimrod patrol area, no need to panic and boot your photoshop up. I don´t think that placing a tiny patrol area like this right above the player sub is good scenario design and probably wans´t intended by the creator to give such results. Also as RA crack you should know that no matter how modern or quiet your sub is, it won´t protect you from MAD/SAD detection but I guess this was your way to try to insult me.

I openly admit that I am not good at this mod and probably never will invest the time amount to become ace with its mechanics. I am not sure what caused the CTD thats why I posted my problem here. I gave nobody fault just shared my observations.

But the way you try to desperately gain an edge with your arrogant and psychic post there shows what a sorry guy you are and that there is not much you have to "offer".

I don´t want to turn this thread into a infantile flame war so we leave it be and I have nothing to discuss with your kind.

[p7p8]

Your accusations and hypotheses are completely missed with truth

I wrote twice to you - read manual - especially weapon settings and you thanks me on YT but did not read anything.
Now after making more "not corrected" procedures you accused me for spamming and more weird things.
I haven't time for answering ridiculous accusations.

Let's focus on game.

Reason why your LAM explodes is here (46:10):



You set waypoint route (last is always waipoint #4) but you did not change SSN shut/LAM point and leave 0001

It means: LAM attack target on waypoint #1

And now screen from weapon manual pdf:



You should read manual

[Jace11]

They should put this Arleigh Burke model into RA. It has animations for CIWS, TT's, FC radars and main gun. Good enough for a controllable platform IMHO.

[p7p8]

Model 3d is less than 1% of working on additional playable warship.

[Pirate]

Originally Posted by Jace11

They should put this Arleigh Burke model into RA. It has animations for CIWS, TT's, FC radars and main gun. Good enough for a controllable platform IMHO.

It looks nice.
Where's that model from? LWAMI?...

[Jace11]

It's from ACTUV, it was in the 3d archive. I believe it may have been ported to Lwami, but whether its used or not I don't know. RA uses the old models.

[Pirate]

Originally Posted by Jace11

It's from ACTUV, it was in the 3d archive. I believe it may have been ported to Lwami, but whether its used or not I don't know. RA uses the old models.

I thought the RA guys had imported all the improved models from ACTUV into RA, but apparently not!

[p7p8]

Some models with lights were imported. Like Fishing boat 2, probably active lighthouse cargo ship - maybe more

[Wolfcat]

In vanilla, Arleigh and Ticon used to have VLS launch animation. You can see the missiles going up vertically from their cells. But RA messed it up. All you see now is a puff of smoke in mid-air and missiles are gone. DDGH doesn't seem to have helo hangers in the back. They seriously need revamp the 3D models for the existing ships rather than adding in all those new cool looking new ships. I am not saying they shouldn't add new platforms. But please do spend a bit more time on existing ones because a lot of scenarios and campaigns are based those platforms.

[Fearless]

Hi all,

Is there a way the Collins class sub's sensors can be adjusted so that at 10 Kts the broadband can still be used? It is very frustrating that the variation between 7 and 10 kts is huge.

UPDATE: Found where to adjust.

[Fearless]

Hi all,
Can anyone advise which interface is used by the Collins Class sub?
Thanks in advance

UPDATE: Solved

[Fearless]

Hi Team,

Can anyone advise what the ShipControlColl.dll file's purpose is that is located in the NON_NUKE_SUB folder?

Thanks in advance.