![]() |
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
![]() |
#1 |
Ocean Warrior
![]() Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Sheffield, England
Posts: 2,679
Downloads: 165
Uploads: 0
|
Does having the scopes fully extended affect UBoat performance?
One question I have always asked myself ever since I got serious about SH3 was "does having the scopes fully extended impede UBoat performance at all?" Example,I am ploughing through a 15/mps storm,waves are spilling right over the top,its pissing it down and there is a medium fog (what do you expect,I am in the North Sea
![]() I have watched my speed for about 30 mins now and cant seem to detect any obvious change other than the sea current slowing me down 1-2 kts. If it DOES affect performance would the same hold true for submerged operations?. For the record,I will shadow the contact until nightfall and attack surfaced from a range of approx 2-3km (if the storm doesnt clear that is) I remember reading about real UBoats in such conditions and I think it did affect performance somewhat,and I know they used to fully lower the scopes before submerging,to prevent the off chance they broke off from the force of submerging at speed. Thanks.
__________________
Best Patrol: 10 merchants + HMS Nelson for 68.056 Tonnes |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Machinist's Mate
![]() Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Lincs, UK
Posts: 124
Downloads: 43
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
'Tis a good question, and for a definite answer on whether or not it affects in-game performance I think you'd need to ask one of the "supermod" devs.
I'll say one thing I can definitely answer though - If you're cruising around with your scopes fully raised, you will be a whole lot more noticeable to the enemy. I think in the real world it would also be heavily discouraged as keeping one or both scopes fully raised would raise the centre of gravity of the boat. This would effectively act as an inverted pendulum stuck on the top of the boat and make it roll a lot more in a heavy seas. I should imagine this could likely damage the periscope(s) by bending or twisting them if the sea was rough enough or they were kept fully extended for excessive periods of time.
__________________
In danger of becoming the resident Windows 7 apologist ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Ocean Warrior
![]() Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Sheffield, England
Posts: 2,679
Downloads: 165
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
Cheers Panser ![]()
__________________
Best Patrol: 10 merchants + HMS Nelson for 68.056 Tonnes |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Sea Lord
![]() Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Lux, betw. G, B and F
Posts: 1,898
Downloads: 66
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
no the periscopes and snorkel are independant of sub performance.
especially s snorkel woul be torn off by water resistance at high speeds, yet, in the game, nothing happens. no performance drop. simple as that ![]()
__________________
In conclusion: SH3 is the shizzle, yo. -Frau Kaleun Another negative about using your deck gun is that you are definately DETECTED, which has long term effects on your relationship with aircraft. -snestorm |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Ocean Warrior
![]() Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Sheffield, England
Posts: 2,679
Downloads: 165
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Thanks for the replies
![]()
__________________
Best Patrol: 10 merchants + HMS Nelson for 68.056 Tonnes |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|