![]() |
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Ace of the Deep
![]() Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,134
Downloads: 93
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
I just the following email off to a friend describing my first convoy attack attempt with SH3/GWX. Below if anyone is interested in some comparisons:
Quote:
__________________
War games, not wars! --- Only a small few profit from war (that should not stand)! |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Soundman
![]() Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 147
Downloads: 18
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Good Story Markshot!
Last night I had my first attempted convoy intercept. In stock SH3 I would have drawn a straight line from the tail of the contact marker and just lied in wait ahead of the convoy. Not this time, no tail, just a cardinal coordinate. I plotted the general direction and some range rings to determine when I should start a search pattern. It was only a 5 hour transit to this point. I tried several legs and hydrophone checks....but no luck. Either the convoy changed direction (zigged, etc) or I just missed it or the crew was too green to pick up the convoy I will never know. Despite not being able to intercept I was actually happy to see that I couldn't find it and that I had some challenges ahead of me....making the reward all the more worthwhile! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Ace of the Deep
![]() Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,134
Downloads: 93
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Well, I copied my career so that I could replay the attack a number of times to see what I could learn from it:
(1) Escorts were not really in the convoy themselves. The fire which was being directed at my attack scope was coming from the merchants themselves. Although this fire is to be taken seriously, there is certainly adequate time to get off a spread of four provided that you properly anticipate a bore sited AOB 90 attack on a close merchant. (2) Given the above, it is possible to have your solution at 80% readiness before raising the scope. Thus, as the scope comes up, you can do the final refinement and launch. (3) Once the fish are away, it's time to crash dive anyway. Watching kills is always the mark of inexperience in subsims ... like any good sniper, one shoots and displaces immediately. (4) So, it is my estimation that such attacks are completely viable. My biggest fear in making such attacks be it: AOD, SH1, or SH3 is that you come to PD in the direct path of a merchant which runs over your boat. With contacts on here, this is not too bad, since you can really see their path. Even in AOD, it can be worked out. If you have fast swinging lines of bearing with one group and a single line holding steady, then you are on a collision course. Without contacts on in SH3, you could get the same thing by having sonar tracking the closest merchant; once again a rapidly closing close merchant with no bearing change is an impending collision.
__________________
War games, not wars! --- Only a small few profit from war (that should not stand)! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |||
Commodore
![]() Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 641
Downloads: 168
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
![]() Quote:
I generally wait to attack convoys at night to reduce the possibility of one of the merchants spotting me before my torpedoes announce my presence; they aren't the best spotters in the world, but the number of eyes in the convoy adds up quickly, and if any of them detect you they all detect you. Later in the war, I try to shoot from outside the escort screen at ships on the far side of a convoy, as the escort AI seems to respond to the side of the convoy that is struck, rather than the side of the individual ship that is torpedoed. FAT (track-reversing torpedoes) can be very useful in this regard. These approaches maximize my time to set up the shot, shoot, and then start my evasion routine. Quote:
![]() Nice write-up! Pablo
__________________
"...far better it is to dare mighty things, to win glorious triumphs even though checkered by failure, than to rank with those poor spirits who neither enjoy much nor suffer much, because they live in the gray twilight that knows neither victory nor defeat." - Theodore Roosevelt, speech before the Hamilton Club, Chicago, April 10, 1899 |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Ace of the Deep
![]() Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,134
Downloads: 93
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
More comparison impressions between SH3/GWX and AOD (comparing mid-41 in a VIIC):
*** Preparations *** Depending on what options you use in SH3/GWX, preparing for an attack can be more challenging as you try to plot a track for the convoy. AOD provides you with a strat map course and position marker which gives you everything which you need. Preparations may be more interesting in AOD. There is a real BDU which may order you to only shadow the convoy as a wolf pack is formed up. Then, after a day or two, the order goes out to attack. *** Long & Medium Attack *** The long and medium positioning to attack in AOD is harder. Escorts ping constantly and seem to cover more surface area as they screen the convoy. Additionally, they are generally positioned further out from the convoy ... which could, of course, account for the fact that they seem to move around more. So, getting past the screen is quite a bit more difficult. In AOD, going deep seems to be a good way to avoid the screen. I haven't really tried that in SH3/GWX, because when moving at 1kts coming to PD takes forever. Diving and surfacing seem quite a bit faster in AOD. Another thing which makes long and medium positioning in AOD harder than SH3/GWX is that the convoy seems to alter course more frequently and radically in AOD. Zigs occur after, at most, three hours, but can happen in as little as 30 minutes. Zigs will be from 20-60 degrees. However, after playing for a while you learn to anticipate and take advantage of zigs. So, you position your boat where the convoy will be traveling the next time it zigs. *** Close Attack *** However, the in close portion of the attack is definitely more challenging in SH3/GWX: (1) Many merchants seems to be armed. (2) Escorts are much quicker to spot a scope. (3) The escorts search for subs within the bounds of the convoy itself. So, they are in much closer proximity as you get ready to shoot. (4) Some of the SH3 targetting options require considerably more work than AOD. On the other hand, quite a bit of AOD targetting can be done right from the map. (5) SA tends to be higher in AOD. (6) Convoys seem to be more tightly packed in SH3/GWX. Thus, the danger of getting run over by merchants is much greater. *** Disengaging *** This is harder in AOD: (1) Escorts coordinate their search activities. (2) Near misses and accurate DCs seem much more likely. (3) Due to the above, it becomes necessary to spend battery charge and compressed air in order survive. Thus, resource management becomes much more of an issue when compared to SH3/GWX. You have maybe 7-8 good sprints to survive accurate DCs, and then your batteries are done for. Correspondingly, you have about one hour of compressed air to allow you to stay below test depth. Beyond that your boat will flood and sink. (4) However, oxygen seems to deplete faster SH3/GWX.
__________________
War games, not wars! --- Only a small few profit from war (that should not stand)! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Navy Seal
![]() Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Docked on a Russian pond
Posts: 7,072
Downloads: 2
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Though I'm not familiar with AOD, the comparisons are interesting.
__________________
Espionage, adventure, suspense, are just a click away Click here to look inside Brag's book: Amazon.com: Kingmaker: Alexey Braguine: Books Order Kingmaker here: http://www.subsim.com/store.html For Tactics visit:http://www.freewebs.com/kielman/ ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Pacific Aces Dev Team
|
![]()
AOD has still the best gameplay ever IMO. But nowadays, I couldn't return to it not because of the graphics, but because of the manual targeting. I have becomed really inloved with that essential aspect of gameplay, and could not go on without it
![]()
__________________
One day I will return to sea ... |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|