SUBSIM Radio Room Forums



SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997

Go Back   SUBSIM Radio Room Forums > General > General Topics
Forget password? Reset here

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-20-21, 10:53 AM   #16
mapuc
Fleet Admiral
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Denmark
Posts: 17,859
Downloads: 37
Uploads: 0


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Skybird View Post
Sounds as if this christmas a cooking book is on order...!?


Markus
__________________

My little lovely female cat
mapuc is online   Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-21, 11:40 AM   #17
Ostfriese
Ace of the Deep
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Northern Germany
Posts: 1,174
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 3catcircus View Post
Likely not. Any fission would likely be short-lived, resulting in the critical mass/geometry melting or shifting, becoming subcritical again.

You need to remember that the core has flowed all over the basement as molten corium, so any portions that could fission again are much further away from having enough mass in the right geometry.
I doubt that there's any chance to achieve critical mass due to shifts/melting and a self-sustained chain reaction as a consequence of this. It would require quite pure amounts of fissible material melting/shifting together, and after 35 years of decaying there shouldn't be much material that can be considered "pure" left - and that's before considering that the corium is a wild mixture of fuel rods, remains of the control rods, concrete, steel, zirconium, sand and soil, among other things.


The article mentions "irradiated uranium", which is pretty strange and suggests that the writer doesn't know enough about the topic. Uranium is always radioactive, it doesn't have any stable isotopes, and it cannot be irradiated.



There could be a variety of reasons for the increased neutron count, starting with recently opened leaks/cracks, which would allow water or steam to pass through and carry radioactive material into the range of the sensors.

Last edited by Ostfriese; 09-20-21 at 11:48 AM.
Ostfriese is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-21, 12:22 PM   #18
mapuc
Fleet Admiral
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Denmark
Posts: 17,859
Downloads: 37
Uploads: 0


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ostfriese View Post

The article mentions "irradiated uranium", which is pretty strange and suggests that the writer doesn't know enough about the topic. Uranium is always radioactive, it doesn't have any stable isotopes, and it cannot be irradiated.
I do not have much knowledge about Uranium and nuclear power. It was through a Danish article I found the English version and I just copied the title of this article.
We have been discussing Chernobyl before, which was the reason behind my idea of posting it here.

Markus
__________________

My little lovely female cat
mapuc is online   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:54 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2024 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.