SUBSIM Radio Room Forums



SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997

Go Back   SUBSIM Radio Room Forums > General > Sub & Naval Discussions: World Naval News, Books, & Films
Forget password? Reset here

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-30-22, 04:22 PM   #1
kapuhy
Grey Wolf
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Poland
Posts: 873
Downloads: 72
Uploads: 3
Default Donald McIntyre on hydrophones

I've just read Donald McIntyre's "U-Boat Killer" and there's one fragment that I found very surprising. On pages 234-235, describing difficulties while working with base personnel, author gives a following example of just how uninformed was land-based staff regarding ASW tactics:

"Another illustration of this was given me when, in visiting the underground headquarters at Plymouth to make my report on a patrol, I happened to meet a very senior officer who asked me how things were going. On explaining the difficulties we were experiencing in the use of asdic in the Channel owing to the great number of submerged obstructions (...) this venerable character nodded. "Ah yes," he said, "but of course you have your hydrophones to help you". There was little point in trying to enlighten him, though hydrophones had not been used to hunt submarines since the early days of the 1914-18 War!".

Emphasis mine. I have little reason to believe McIntyre, who spent entire war hunting U-Boats, would be wrong on this subject. Yet in all U-Boat simulations I ever played escorts seem to use hydrophones extensively, we have all these silent running tactics and such... is this something that all subsim designers got completely wrong? And if not, what could he mean by this sentence?
kapuhy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-22, 10:41 PM   #2
KaleunMarco
Silent Hunter
 
KaleunMarco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Chicago area, which is more dangerous than Omaha Beach.
Posts: 3,894
Downloads: 431
Uploads: 26


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kapuhy View Post
I've just read Donald McIntyre's "U-Boat Killer" and there's one fragment that I found very surprising. On pages 234-235, describing difficulties while working with base personnel, author gives a following example of just how uninformed was land-based staff regarding ASW tactics:

"Another illustration of this was given me when, in visiting the underground headquarters at Plymouth to make my report on a patrol, I happened to meet a very senior officer who asked me how things were going. On explaining the difficulties we were experiencing in the use of asdic in the Channel owing to the great number of submerged obstructions (...) this venerable character nodded. "Ah yes," he said, "but of course you have your hydrophones to help you". There was little point in trying to enlighten him, though hydrophones had not been used to hunt submarines since the early days of the 1914-18 War!".

Emphasis mine. I have little reason to believe McIntyre, who spent entire war hunting U-Boats, would be wrong on this subject. Yet in all U-Boat simulations I ever played escorts seem to use hydrophones extensively, we have all these silent running tactics and such... is this something that all subsim designers got completely wrong? And if not, what could he mean by this sentence?
it sounds like Brit humor to me. the senior officer was taking the mickey out on the junior officer.
or
the senior officer was a ditz who hadn't served in either subs or convoy duty and had no notion of underwater sound physics.

i suppose you can take your pick as to which is true.

what is important is that YOU know the difference between hydrophones and ASDIC (sonar).

__________________
there are only two things in the world: submarines and targets.
Fortis et stabilis et fidelis, semper


------------------------------------------------------------
Silent Hunter 4 1.5 Gold Edition on CDROM
LAA enabled
Dell XPS with 32 GB Ram running Win10
KaleunMarco is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-22, 05:54 AM   #3
kapuhy
Grey Wolf
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Poland
Posts: 873
Downloads: 72
Uploads: 3
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by KaleunMarco View Post
what is important is that YOU know the difference between hydrophones and ASDIC (sonar).
I do know, and I also understand that hydrophones are, by necessity, part of any asdic set (you need a device to receive reflections of sound waves you've sent after all). I just wondered what he meant by that. It maybe just Brit humour that non-Brits like me don't get, or perhaps (that crossed my mind) they relied on active pinging around in hopes of getting a solid asdic echo instead of using receiver to listen for screw sounds. Maybe the second method was simply very ineffective by comparison so they skipped listening part and just pinged around?

But I'm no expert on asdic procedures so it's just my wild guessing
kapuhy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-22, 06:18 PM   #4
John Pancoast
Ocean Warrior
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Minnysoda
Posts: 3,162
Downloads: 488
Uploads: 4


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kapuhy View Post
<snip>...is this something that all subsim designers got completely wrong? ...<snip>

Yes. Except for AOD. SH3 is especially bad in this regard (hydrophone use/requirement).
I too have mentioned this (his comments) before. Including that they pinged with asdic all the time, not just when they suspected a target was around.
He (rightly) considered hydrophones as archiac, obsolete technology.
__________________
"Realistic" is not always GAME-GOOD." - Wave Skipper
John Pancoast is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:49 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2024 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.