Click here to access the Helosim website
SUBSIM Radio Room Forums

BUYING GAMES, BOOKS, ELECTRONICS, and STUFF
THROUGH THIS LINK SUPPORTS SUBSIM, THANKS!

The Web's #1 BBS for all submarine and naval simulations!

Go Back   SUBSIM Radio Room Forums > General > Helosim.com and Flight Sims

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-26-09, 03:10 PM   #1
FIREWALL
Eternal Patrol
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: CATALINA IS. SO . CAL USA
Posts: 10,108
Downloads: 511
Uploads: 0
Default WWI FIGHTER for FSX

A couple of pics. More planes and missions and campains.




__________________
RIP FIREWALL

I Play GWX. Silent Hunter Who ???
FIREWALL is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-09, 03:16 PM   #2
Raptor1
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Stavka
Posts: 8,211
Downloads: 13
Uploads: 0
Default

Mmm, Fokker Dreidecker

Try not to snap the top wing
__________________
Current Eastern Front status: Probable Victory
Raptor1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-09, 03:25 PM   #3
FIREWALL
Eternal Patrol
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: CATALINA IS. SO . CAL USA
Posts: 10,108
Downloads: 511
Uploads: 0
Default

In the readme it took an Ace with skills to fly it to it's full potential.

quote: Pilots referred to Fokker Triplane as a exceptionally maneuverable plane, due to thick wing section it could climb rapidly and all in all had perfect flight characteristics that only Sopwith Camel could argue. The shortcoming of the plane was that only highly experienced pilots could use its full potential
__________________
RIP FIREWALL

I Play GWX. Silent Hunter Who ???
FIREWALL is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-09, 03:29 PM   #4
Raptor1
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Stavka
Posts: 8,211
Downloads: 13
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FIREWALL View Post
In the readme it took an Ace with skills to fly it to it's full potential.

quote: Pilots referred to Fokker Triplane as a exceptionally maneuverable plane, due to thick wing section it could climb rapidly and all in all had perfect flight characteristics that only Sopwith Camel could argue. The shortcoming of the plane was that only highly experienced pilots could use its full potential
Oh, they don't mention how ssssssssllllllllllllloooooooooooowwwwwww it was, and the fact that it tended to have rather nasty wing failures?

Though it did have pretty amazing maneuverability...

Though there is in fact a fighter which could be described as the best fighter of WWI, and that would be the Fokker D.VII
__________________
Current Eastern Front status: Probable Victory
Raptor1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-09, 03:35 PM   #5
FIREWALL
Eternal Patrol
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: CATALINA IS. SO . CAL USA
Posts: 10,108
Downloads: 511
Uploads: 0
Default

Bet it didn't look as KOOL. Especially in RED
__________________
RIP FIREWALL

I Play GWX. Silent Hunter Who ???
FIREWALL is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-09, 02:55 PM   #6
Platapus
Fleet Admiral
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 18,960
Downloads: 63
Uploads: 0


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Raptor1 View Post
Though there is in fact a fighter which could be described as the best fighter of WWI, and that would be the Fokker D.VII

D Vii was so good that it was specifically called out in the peace treaty.
__________________
abusus non tollit usum - A right should NOT be withheld from people on the basis that some tend to abuse that right.
Platapus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-09, 05:05 PM   #7
Biggles
Silent Hunter
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Sweden (I'm not a Viking...)
Posts: 3,528
Downloads: 5
Uploads: 0
Default

Well the Snipe wasn't too bad either.
__________________
Biggles is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-09, 01:07 AM   #8
Stealth Hunter
Silent Hunter
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Y'ha-Nthlei
Posts: 4,262
Downloads: 19
Uploads: 0
Default

The Fokker D.VIII is my personal favorite, although the D.VII is right up there. The D.VIII, though, has the speed and relative stability of the D.VII, it has the maneuverability of the DR.I, and it has the aerodynamic body of a racing plane. It was the perfect combination. Pity they weren't introduced earlier. Germany would have owned all other nations royally in the air war.

Here's a picture of the great Erich Loewenhardt testing out a D.VIII. He shot down two Sopwith Camels in a single day with it, but he was never given one officially:



This is probably my favorite picture of him, just because of his yellow DR.I behind him:



Of course, there's also Werner Voss' photos with his DR.I:


Stealth Hunter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-09, 03:51 AM   #9
Raptor1
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Stavka
Posts: 8,211
Downloads: 13
Uploads: 0
Default

It also had some perfectly fatal wing failures (Were those resolved, BTW?, can't remember)
__________________
Current Eastern Front status: Probable Victory
Raptor1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-09, 04:15 AM   #10
Lieste
Soundman
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 142
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Default

I personally like the Siemens Schukhert DIII and DIV.

Not the fastest aircraft of the war, but a rotary with no gyro coupling (countra rotation of the prop and cylinders), and very efficient prop.

Definitely the fastest climbers of the war by a long margin, relatively light and probably quite agile. Supposed to be a bit of a handful though.
Lieste is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-09, 05:07 AM   #11
Biggles
Silent Hunter
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Sweden (I'm not a Viking...)
Posts: 3,528
Downloads: 5
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Raptor1 View Post
It also had some perfectly fatal wing failures (Were those resolved, BTW?, can't remember)
No, not from what I can remember. Heard they quit making them alltogether. Was at the end of the war too so...
__________________
Biggles is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-09, 05:26 AM   #12
Stealth Hunter
Silent Hunter
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Y'ha-Nthlei
Posts: 4,262
Downloads: 19
Uploads: 0
Default

The D.VIII? Hell no. They kept making it to the end of the war. In fact, they were passed over to many of the Entente nations for future use.

And the early versions had wing flaws, but the later ones were resolved by fixing the rear wing spars. The ones that had the most ones weren't even manufactured by Fokker; they were made by Junkers, and they had a full investigation done into their designs after several cases of the E.V crashing due to wing failures. The Razor earned its name with flying colors in the end after Fokker got his hands on it.
Stealth Hunter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-09, 08:53 AM   #13
Biggles
Silent Hunter
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Sweden (I'm not a Viking...)
Posts: 3,528
Downloads: 5
Uploads: 0
Default

I was referring to the DR.I
__________________
Biggles is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-09, 09:11 PM   #14
Stealth Hunter
Silent Hunter
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Y'ha-Nthlei
Posts: 4,262
Downloads: 19
Uploads: 0
Default

Oh yeah, it still had wing problems. By late 1918, they basically stopped giving it out to frontline units. However, it was still used, just not as much. The D.VII was the biggest plane of the war by that time.

Here's a photo of Hermann Goering's D.VII (known as "The White Rose"):

Stealth Hunter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-09, 02:59 PM   #15
Catfish
Dipped Squirrel Operative
 
Catfish's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: ..where the ocean meets the sky
Posts: 16,897
Downloads: 38
Uploads: 0


Default

Hello,
very nice pics ! Thanks for sharing - this FSX add-on looks promising - has anyone played some missions, and a campaign ?! Any testers already ?

@Raptor1: Would you tell me where your picture with the airships is from ?

Thanks and greetings,
Catfish
Catfish is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:39 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2024 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.