SUBSIM Radio Room Forums



SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997

Go Back   SUBSIM Radio Room Forums > Silent Hunter 3 - 4 - 5 > Silent Hunter III
Forget password? Reset here

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-17-20, 12:27 PM   #1
U64
Stowaway
 
Posts: n/a
Downloads:
Uploads:
Default Sinking ships before reaching patrol zone

Hi there.


Just a little historical question about permissions and orders from BDU.
Sometimes, it was prohibited for kaleuns to sunk lonely merchants (I'm not talkin' about convoys) before reaching their proper patrol zone or missions area. The main goal being to remain discreet and undetected until the designated patrol grids and save the torpedoes, like Paukenschlag for instance.

Was it a mandatory rule from BDU or an order used sometimes for specific operations and patrols ?

Saw a lot of players who don't hesitate to engage lonely merchants ships while "en route" to their patrol zone and I wanted to know how this practice was tolerated by BDU historically.

Thanks in advance.

Last edited by U64; 02-17-20 at 03:41 PM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-20, 09:16 PM   #2
John Pancoast
Ocean Warrior
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Minnysoda
Posts: 3,182
Downloads: 490
Uploads: 4


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by U64 View Post
Hi there.


Just a little historical question about permissions and orders from BDU.
Sometimes, it was prohibited for kaleuns to sunk lonely merchants (I'm not talkin' about convoys) before reaching their proper patrol zone or missions area. The main goal being to remain discreet and undetected until the designated patrol grids and save the torpedoes, like Paukenschlag for instance.

Was it a mandatory rule from BDU or an order used sometimes for specific operations and patrols ?

Saw a lot of players who don't hesitate to engage lonely merchants ships while "en route" to their patrol zone and I wanted to know how this practice was tolerated by BDU historically.

Thanks in advance.

In reading Blair's books several times, I don't recall any mention of any skipper getting into trouble for the scenario you mention.

Plenty of examples of them attacking before they got to where they were going though.
__________________
"Realistic" is not always GAME-GOOD." - Wave Skipper
John Pancoast is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-20, 12:55 AM   #3
Fifi
Navy Seal
 
Fifi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: France
Posts: 5,723
Downloads: 452
Uploads: 0


Default

Orders were quite simple: sink as much as possible Allies merchants ships.
I don’t see why they would skip targets on the way to patrol area!...
Fifi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-20, 01:57 AM   #4
Randomizer
Watch Officer
 
Join Date: Mar 2019
Location: Vancouver Island
Posts: 334
Downloads: 131
Uploads: 0


Default

One possible exception might have been the seven boats sent to North American waters for Drumbeat. They were given a date and ordered not to conduct any attacks before so as to maximize the element of surprise. One boat did attack early, Hardigan I think but could be mistaken. So far as I recall, no action was taken against the early shooter.

-C
Randomizer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-20, 04:48 AM   #5
John Pancoast
Ocean Warrior
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Minnysoda
Posts: 3,182
Downloads: 490
Uploads: 4


Default

For that matter, I don't recall ever reading that it was "prohibited to sink lonely merchants" etc. in any source.
__________________
"Realistic" is not always GAME-GOOD." - Wave Skipper
John Pancoast is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-20, 05:36 AM   #6
Kapitän
The Old Man
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Frankfurt, Germany
Posts: 1,580
Downloads: 29
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Randomizer View Post
One possible exception might have been the seven boats sent to North American waters for Drumbeat. They were given a date and ordered not to conduct any attacks before so as to maximize the element of surprise. One boat did attack early, Hardigan I think but could be mistaken. So far as I recall, no action was taken against the early shooter.

-C

Yes! The rational was: "You never let a 10,000 tonner go." ;-)
__________________
KSDII-Ace/GWX 3.0 Gold/CCoM 10.0 + h.sie-patch; Windows 7 (64-bit); NVIDIA GeForce GTX650 (310.90)
Kapitän is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-20, 10:20 AM   #7
U64
Stowaway
 
Posts: n/a
Downloads:
Uploads:
Default

Thanks a lot for your answers !
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:09 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2024 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.