SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
01-10-11, 06:04 PM | #76 |
Navy Seal
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 8,643
Downloads: 19
Uploads: 0
|
|
01-10-11, 06:31 PM | #77 |
Helmsman
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 104
Downloads: 17
Uploads: 0
|
i'd personally prefer fleet command 2 (better graphics) but i'd still buy any of the games i suggested.
|
01-10-11, 08:18 PM | #78 |
Silent Hunter
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Jakarta
Posts: 4,794
Downloads: 89
Uploads: 6
|
Agree.
__________________
|
01-11-11, 05:54 AM | #79 |
Medic
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 167
Downloads: 9
Uploads: 0
|
I'd like to see the same engineering-led approach that works well with 688i and SC. DW got spread a little thin for my liking.
I'd like to stick with the mission approach: DC's are incredibly difficult to do right. That one product has even approached this in the last thirteen years - and still is far from perfect - is warning enough. Open and extendable architecture is a great asset these days. The engine should offer all parameters for output and allow manipulation via plugins, likewise the interface should be extendable by plugins. Charging wise, but the game module and platforms (from Sonalysts) would be paid for / subscription. Perhaps a Sonalysts marketplace with freeware & payware additions from the community / third party?
__________________
"My advice - buy the damn game and play the arse off it. It's not all there yet but it's still a damn good game, and we all know it'll be even better once the community is done crawling all over it." User 'Sideways' 08th March 2010. |
01-11-11, 10:10 AM | #80 |
中国水兵
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 271
Downloads: 82
Uploads: 0
|
Yeah!! Third party developers could implement new Naval designs,stealh technology and new detection-weapon systems, all these to bring to seas a wide range of multinational platforms.
|
01-11-11, 11:50 AM | #81 |
Admiral
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: netherlands
Posts: 2,020
Downloads: 119
Uploads: 0
|
What i would like to see is dangerous waters with upgrade grafics and a 3-d intereur for the sub(s) and possibly ships. It just takes away alot of immersion looking at a 90,s style 2-d screen all the time. But i must confess i would also like to see some sort of carrier sim where you could command the fleet , sail the carrier and plan stikes and even fly the aircraft so some extent.
__________________
we live we die but death does not ends it. Jim Morrison 1943-1971 |
01-11-11, 11:59 AM | #82 | |
Soundman
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Lille, France
Posts: 146
Downloads: 183
Uploads: 0
|
Quote:
|
|
01-11-11, 12:58 PM | #83 |
Commodore
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Right behind you!
Posts: 643
Downloads: 39
Uploads: 0
|
New SCS title
I would be happy with just about anything at this stage. I do hope if it is more Fleet Command than Dangerous Waters that they go more in the Harpoon direction rather than spending too much resources on cute 3rd person graphics.
|
01-11-11, 01:05 PM | #84 |
Samurai Navy
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Western Hemisphere, Earth, Milky Way Galaxy, Local Group, Virgo Supercluster
Posts: 584
Downloads: 22
Uploads: 0
|
CSCS (SW/AW) Jane Doe: "Hey CAPT, want to try my soup?" (for the tenth time)
CAPT Player: Senior Chief, if you ask me about that damned soup one more time, I'll have you: - NJP'd - Have the Master-at-Arms throw your ass in the brig. - Sent to mast. - Keelhauled - Shot. - All of the above. --- In all seriousness, I'd pay full price just for the old DW updated with new graphics. Last edited by Kaye T. Bai; 01-11-11 at 02:06 PM. |
01-11-11, 01:05 PM | #85 |
中国水兵
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 271
Downloads: 82
Uploads: 0
|
Yes but,a more accurate ports and vessels should be needed,and GLOBAL covering of course,not just single maps.So, a start into the Cold War would be ok,managing full CBGs for later make expansions......decade by decade?
|
01-11-11, 01:20 PM | #86 | |
Argentinian Skipper
|
Quote:
Regards. Fitzcarraldo
__________________
My subject is War, and the pity of War. The Poetry is in the pity - Wilfred Owen. |
|
01-11-11, 03:21 PM | #87 |
Soundman
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Lille, France
Posts: 146
Downloads: 183
Uploads: 0
|
Wishes
1) Vital (absolute bottom line, could be partly done by community if source made available )
- Refine the bugs of core game - More stable multiplayer structure (seems possible based on RA achievements) - Lwami/RA like database (enriched and community maintainable) - Refined doctrines based on community development - Open to developers in order to increase lifetime and enrich the basic game (database structure, game engine maybe some modules only, doctrines) including availability of some extent of documentation - database/mission editing tools upgrade 2) Icing on the cake (but nice to have and probably a must for commercial success) - Detailed maps - Updated graphics (hopefully not jeopardizing model development by community) - Cold war scenarios / campaign / latest naval hotspots , Korea, Narcos Pirates (can be developed by community) - Dynamic campaigns 3) Optional (more work involved obviously: why not expansion pack in 2nd step) - management of additional surface platforms incl carriers and carrier based aircrafts for fleet command enthusiasts It is a dream but the activity on this thread shows that still a lot of us have interest |
01-11-11, 03:44 PM | #88 | |
Pacific Aces Dev Team
|
Quote:
__________________
One day I will return to sea ... |
|
01-11-11, 05:08 PM | #89 |
Planesman
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Germany
Posts: 190
Downloads: 33
Uploads: 0
|
A new DW in the Cold War Era would be nice.
- with new (and modern DX10/11) graphic engine - walkable subs and ships (Control Rom, Bridge) - Dynamic Campaign (large environment as in Silent Hunter - Multiplayer Campaign |
01-11-11, 06:17 PM | #90 | |
Silent Hunter
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Jakarta
Posts: 4,794
Downloads: 89
Uploads: 6
|
Quote:
DW was a vast improvement to SC too in respect that DW now has playable platforms other than submarine(FFG, Plane and helo). It makes great multiplayer game in that way. Just that they provided only blue FFG, blue plane and blue helo and none to play the adversary but submarines. Imagine if they'd give us playable Kirov CG, Ticonderago CG, Japanese Kongo CG, etc too. Please geeky DW fans you must stop playing alone and start playing online a lot to make this idea feasible. That would scare Sonalysts from attempting anything
__________________
|
|
|
|