![]() |
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Sub Test Pilot
|
![]()
Thanks CW they certainly do although I think in future we will be moving more towards the AIP set up
__________________
DONT FORGET if you like a post to nominate it by using the blue diamond ![]() ![]() ![]() Find out about Museum Ships here: https://www.museumships.us/ Flickr for all my pictures: https://www.flickr.com/photos/131313936@N03/ Navy general board articles: https://www.navygeneralboard.com/author/aegis/ |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | ||
Navy Seal
![]() |
![]() Quote:
That certainly seems to be the trend and has distinct advantages. Countries that can't afford or have no need for nuclear propulsion submarines can still field effective submarines with AIP propulsion systems. AIP can also be used in conjunction with diesel electric propulsion systems as well. Quote:
Thanks for the information, Markus. Last edited by Commander Wallace; 05-16-22 at 09:23 AM. |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Sub Test Pilot
|
![]()
Thats the current trend for Canada and conventional boats certainly have many advantages over the Nukes.
__________________
DONT FORGET if you like a post to nominate it by using the blue diamond ![]() ![]() ![]() Find out about Museum Ships here: https://www.museumships.us/ Flickr for all my pictures: https://www.flickr.com/photos/131313936@N03/ Navy general board articles: https://www.navygeneralboard.com/author/aegis/ |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|