The Coup D'etat of November 1963 - Page 8

vienna · 11-22-13, 05:31 PM

I didn't realize that Bubbles was a poster writer and that he was that old...

<O>

mapuc · 11-22-13, 05:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by eddie

Interesting..........

Interesting yes and yet it is no surprise. They were not the only ones who shared leaflets to the passing.

This also happens today when some American city is visited by president Obama.

That a person or group of persons hate a competent person, such as the president, is not the same as they will eliminate this person.

Markus

Bubblehead1980 · 11-22-13, 05:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mapuc

Interesting yes and yet it is no surprise. They were not the only ones who shared leaflets to the passing.

This also happens today when some American city is visited by president Obama.

That a person or group of persons hate a competent person, such as the president, is not the same as they will eliminate this person.

Markus

Oh don't even try to compare Obama to Kennedy, whole different animal. Obama competent? LOL good one. Kennedy's policies had his faults, he was more fluff than substance but he was trying to do some good things(end vietnam, take on the federal reserve) for which he was killed.

Bubblehead1980 · 11-22-13, 05:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Schroeder

Isn't that the same stuff they accuse Obama nowadays of?

Don't even, Obama is an entirely different animal.

11-22-13, 06:22 PM

It's all makeing sense now.
Aliens are mentioned on the poster and this.
http://www.examiner.com/article/kenn...o-ufos-and-cia

mapuc · 11-22-13, 07:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by privateer

It's all makeing sense now.
Aliens are mentioned on the poster and this.
http://www.examiner.com/article/kenn...o-ufos-and-cia

I knew it, after that, ET tried to phone home, just to tell them "job done"

Markus

mapuc · 11-22-13, 07:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bubblehead1980

Oh don't even try to compare Obama to Kennedy, whole different animal. Obama competent? LOL good one. Kennedy's policies had his faults, he was more fluff than substance but he was trying to do some good things(end vietnam, take on the federal reserve) for which he was killed.

What I was trying to tell you is that it's a big leap from hate / disagree with a politician and then do something very stupid to the very same politician

I was not trying to compare those two President, just giving an example.

Markus

Sailor Steve · 11-22-13, 07:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Schroeder

Isn't that the same stuff they accuse Obama nowadays of?

Exactly what I was going to say.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bubblehead1980

Don't even, Obama is an entirely different animal.

He didn't compare them, just what's being said. It's almost word for word.

It reminds me of several years ago when someone said that America was going to hell in a handbasket. I pointed out that that's been said by the losing side of every election for the past two hundred years. He replied "But now it really is!"

That has also been said by the losing side of every election for the past two hundred years.

"If Jefferson is elected, murder, rape, robbery, adultery and incest will be openly taught and practiced!"

Bubblehead1980 · 11-23-13, 05:09 AM

Some interesting things here....

Sailor Steve · 11-23-13, 09:35 AM

Also some interesting comments below the video.

mapuc · 11-23-13, 02:01 PM

It is said that science isn't exact and this couldn't be more true.

Yesterday I saw on Danish TV the documentary, which TarJak have beent talking about in this thread-(watch it through my HDDm had it recorded)

After have watching this documentary I watch an another one
"Inside the assassination of JFK"

In the first documentary it was said that the bullet came from behind
In the next documentary the speaker said that the bullet came from the front
(the shot that hit him in the throat)

I could continue with all the differences that was between those two documentary.

I really really wonder IF it isn't in the USA's interest to find out who did it and why.

Today I even saw a documatery movie-Even here it was not the same is in the first two program I talked about.

Markus

TarJak · 11-23-13, 02:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mapuc

It is said that science isn't exact and this couldn't be more true.

Yesterday I saw on Danish TV the documentary, which TarJak have beent talking about in this thread-(watch it through my HDDm had it recorded)

After have watching this documentary I watch an another one
"Inside the assassination of JFK"

In the first documentary it was said that the bullet came from behind
In the next documentary the speaker said that the bullet came from the front
(the shot that hit him in the throat)

I could continue with all the differences that was between those two documentary.

I really really wonder IF it isn't in the USA's interest to find out who did it and why.

Today I even saw a documatery movie-Even here it was not the same is in the first two program I talked about.

Markus

The problem with documtaries that say the bullet came from the front is that they ignore the evidence of the entry wound in the back of Kennedy's head.

mapuc · 11-23-13, 02:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TarJak

The problem with documtaries that say the bullet came from the front is that they ignore the evidence of the entry wound in the back of Kennedy's head.

According to the documentary you talked about, Lee's first shot missed. It was the second shot that hit JFK in the neck and went through his throat

In the second documentary it was the first shot that hit him in the neck

I must say that the documentary you have been talking about is an absolutely plausible possibility.

Could it be so simple at the murder of the century was a simple mistake by a Secret Agent !?

When you put the link here in this thread I couldn't watch it due to some kind of rights, so I was kind of glad when I understood that Danish TV was showing this documentary about this Australians police officer

Markus

Catfish · 11-23-13, 03:02 PM

I did not watch it, but as usual it pays to ask cui bono ?

Kennedy, careful approach to the Soviet Union, a shorter cold war, maybe an earlier breakdown of the SU (or not)

Or a dead Kennedy, threat from outside, defence industry booming, harsher national laws against all those 'commie likers' and justification for s. services funding and not asking questions.

I would not find it astonishing at all if the US secret service had to do something with the assassination. But even if it was not influenced and only helped the hawks by chance, with all this smoke and mirrors 'we' will never know what really happened. One can of course think and decide for oneself, if we look at the history of mankind and compare.. cui bono.

mapuc · 11-23-13, 03:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Catfish

I did not watch it, but as usual it pays to ask cui bono ?

Kennedy, careful approach to the Soviet Union, a shorter cold war, maybe an earlier breakdown of the SU (or not)

Or a dead Kennedy, threat from outside, defence industry booming, harsher national laws against all those 'commie likers'.

I would not find it astonishing at all if the US secret service did have to do something with the assassination. But even if it was not influenced and only helped the hawks by chance, with all this smoke and mirrors 'we' will never know what really happend. One can of course think and decide for oneself, if we look at the history of mankind and compare.. cui bono.

Here is what we know for sure.

JFK was hit by least two shot-here ends the unity. Read 20 different books and you will get 20 different possibility where the shot came from a.s.o

Markus

11-22-13, 05:31 PM	#106
vienna Navy Seal Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: Anywhere but the here & now... Posts: 7,733 Downloads: 85 Uploads: 0	I didn't realize that Bubbles was a poster writer and that he was that old... <O> __________________ __________________________________________________ __

11-23-13, 09:35 AM	#115
Sailor Steve Eternal Patrol Join Date: Nov 2002 Location: High in the mountains of Utah Posts: 50,369 Downloads: 745 Uploads: 249	Also some interesting comments below the video. __________________ “Never do anything you can't take back.” —Rocky Russo

11-22-13, 06:22 PM	#110
Madox58 Stowaway Posts: n/a Downloads: Uploads:	It's all makeing sense now. Aliens are mentioned on the poster and this. http://www.examiner.com/article/kenn...o-ufos-and-cia

11-23-13, 05:09 AM	#114
Bubblehead1980 Navy Seal Join Date: Apr 2009 Location: Florida USA Posts: 7,208 Downloads: 621 Uploads: 44	Some interesting things here....

11-23-13, 02:01 PM	#116
mapuc CINC Pacific Fleet Join Date: Sep 2003 Location: Denmark Posts: 20,665 Downloads: 37 Uploads: 0	It is said that science isn't exact and this couldn't be more true. Yesterday I saw on Danish TV the documentary, which TarJak have beent talking about in this thread-(watch it through my HDDm had it recorded) After have watching this documentary I watch an another one "Inside the assassination of JFK" In the first documentary it was said that the bullet came from behind In the next documentary the speaker said that the bullet came from the front (the shot that hit him in the throat) I could continue with all the differences that was between those two documentary. I really really wonder IF it isn't in the USA's interest to find out who did it and why. Today I even saw a documatery movie-Even here it was not the same is in the first two program I talked about. Markus

11-23-13, 03:02 PM	#119
Catfish Dipped Squirrel Operative Join Date: Sep 2001 Location: ..where the ocean meets the sky Posts: 17,822 Downloads: 38 Uploads: 0	I did not watch it, but as usual it pays to ask cui bono ? Kennedy, careful approach to the Soviet Union, a shorter cold war, maybe an earlier breakdown of the SU (or not) Or a dead Kennedy, threat from outside, defence industry booming, harsher national laws against all those 'commie likers' and justification for s. services funding and not asking questions. I would not find it astonishing at all if the US secret service had to do something with the assassination. But even if it was not influenced and only helped the hawks by chance, with all this smoke and mirrors 'we' will never know what really happened. One can of course think and decide for oneself, if we look at the history of mankind and compare.. cui bono.