Nearest visual contact in YARDS???

razark · 01-07-12, 02:36 AM

Sadly, the fix to this seems to be to learn to estimate division by three. It gets easier with practice.

How stuff like this managed to slip through, I have no idea. There are a lot of minor issues that could make a major difference if they had been included to begin with.

Dignan · 01-07-12, 01:20 PM

Dang. I was afraid that was going to be the answer. Oh well. Better get out the ol' calculator

Capt. Morgan · 01-07-12, 04:09 PM

It's not a bug, it's a feature.

By doing a quick & dirty conversion in your head you are removing the unrealistic accuracy of the range as supplied by your W.O. The poor guys playing SH3 have to have a patch to do this.

01-07-12, 02:36 AM	#1
razark Ocean Warrior Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Houston, TX Posts: 2,731 Downloads: 394 Uploads: 12	Sadly, the fix to this seems to be to learn to estimate division by three. It gets easier with practice. How stuff like this managed to slip through, I have no idea. There are a lot of minor issues that could make a major difference if they had been included to begin with. __________________ "Never ask a World War II history buff for a 'final solution' to your problem!"

01-07-12, 01:20 PM	#2
Dignan Seasoned Skipper Join Date: Mar 2008 Posts: 698 Downloads: 262 Uploads: 0	Dang. I was afraid that was going to be the answer. Oh well. Better get out the ol' calculator __________________

01-07-12, 04:09 PM	#3
Capt. Morgan Commander Join Date: Dec 2009 Location: Just east of the west coast. Posts: 463 Downloads: 424 Uploads: 0	It's not a bug, it's a feature. By doing a quick & dirty conversion in your head you are removing the unrealistic accuracy of the range as supplied by your W.O. The poor guys playing SH3 have to have a patch to do this. __________________ There are no great men, only great challenges that ordinary men are forced by circumstances to meet. -- Admiral William Halsey