Congress sets sail... - Page 2

Takeda Shingen · 10-13-10, 08:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FIREWALL

GAWD Get a sense of humor next time your out and about.

Okay, I'll be sure to do that. But the first rule of humor is that if you have to explain it, it probably isn't funny.

Weiss Pinguin · 10-13-10, 08:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Takeda Shingen

Okay, I'll be sure to do that. But the first rule of humor is that if you have to explain it, it probably isn't funny.

Next time use a picture like this:

FIREWALL · 10-13-10, 09:00 PM

You seem to be one of the few that needed it explained.

The point was, a quick way to get rid of both partys without posting a terrorist threat in detail.

Takeda Shingen · 10-13-10, 09:04 PM

Alright, alright. But in my defense, the relationship between the theoretical formula and the development of nuclear weapons is marginal at best, as it does not explain the creation of energy in the fission process, only that the potential for energy creation can be measured by extrapolation of the loss of mass. As such, when I see the equation, my first thought is spacetime, not nuclear weapons. Accordingly, I was having a hard time seeing the relation to system revision. I do see now.

Evidently I lack the depth of your understanding of theoretical physics. My apologies, sir.

FIREWALL · 10-13-10, 09:09 PM

I shoulda just posted, KABOOM !!!

Ducimus · 10-13-10, 09:37 PM

I find these are the two most effective pic's to convey that particular thought.

(in this context... one for each party.

)

Takeda Shingen · 10-13-10, 10:06 PM

I know the monsterous Tsar Bomba is the top one. What is the second one?

EDIT: Ah, it is also the Tsar Bomba. I've never seen a photo of it from that angle before.

gimpy117 · 10-13-10, 10:47 PM

good luck when the party of no is sitting on the right side of the isle.

TarJak · 10-13-10, 10:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Platapus

Perhaps the problem is not that we have political parties it is that we have only two dominant political parties. Perhaps the solution is to get rid of the dominance factor by having five viable political parties where coalitions will need to be formed.

Thats's really not working for us or the poms as I understand.

frau kaleun · 10-14-10, 08:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FIREWALL

You seem to be one of the few that needed it explained.

The point was, a quick way to get rid of both partys without posting a terrorist threat in detail.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Takeda Shingen

Accordingly, I was having a hard time seeing the relation to system revision. I do see now.

I actually got it when he first posted it, after a brief bit of

The scary thing is, this clearly means that my mind works a lot like Firewall's.

krashkart · 10-14-10, 10:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by frau kaleun

I actually got it when he first posted it, after a brief bit of

The scary thing is, this clearly means that my mind works a lot like Firewall's.

Well, apparently you're not the only one. It took a minute to sink in. The formula contributed to some theories that led to the first successful atom bomb.

10-13-10, 09:00 PM	#18
FIREWALL Eternal Patrol Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: CATALINA IS. SO . CAL USA Posts: 10,108 Downloads: 511 Uploads: 0	You seem to be one of the few that needed it explained. The point was, a quick way to get rid of both partys without posting a terrorist threat in detail. __________________ RIP FIREWALL I Play GWX. Silent Hunter Who ???

10-13-10, 09:09 PM	#20
FIREWALL Eternal Patrol Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: CATALINA IS. SO . CAL USA Posts: 10,108 Downloads: 511 Uploads: 0	I shoulda just posted, KABOOM !!! __________________ RIP FIREWALL I Play GWX. Silent Hunter Who ???

10-13-10, 10:47 PM	#23
gimpy117 Ocean Warrior Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Kalamazoo, MI Posts: 3,243 Downloads: 108 Uploads: 0	good luck when the party of no is sitting on the right side of the isle. __________________ Member of the Subsim Zombie Army

10-13-10, 09:04 PM	#19
Takeda Shingen Navy Seal Join Date: Mar 2000 Posts: 8,643 Downloads: 19 Uploads: 0	Alright, alright. But in my defense, the relationship between the theoretical formula and the development of nuclear weapons is marginal at best, as it does not explain the creation of energy in the fission process, only that the potential for energy creation can be measured by extrapolation of the loss of mass. As such, when I see the equation, my first thought is spacetime, not nuclear weapons. Accordingly, I was having a hard time seeing the relation to system revision. I do see now. Evidently I lack the depth of your understanding of theoretical physics. My apologies, sir.

10-13-10, 09:37 PM	#21
Ducimus Rear Admiral Join Date: May 2005 Posts: 12,987 Downloads: 67 Uploads: 2	I find these are the two most effective pic's to convey that particular thought. (in this context... one for each party. )

10-13-10, 10:06 PM	#22
Takeda Shingen Navy Seal Join Date: Mar 2000 Posts: 8,643 Downloads: 19 Uploads: 0	I know the monsterous Tsar Bomba is the top one. What is the second one? EDIT: Ah, it is also the Tsar Bomba. I've never seen a photo of it from that angle before.