sh3 into sh4?

[clayton]

I wouldn't be so damn negative if I didn't see post like this everytime I check for new mods! Again, my right!

[clayton]

Originally Posted by Alex

Personnally I don't care about your negative opinion. Just let us say we want an atlantic campaign for SH4, and that's all.

Thanks !

BTW, ins't their a forum for just this subject? I'm not sure but I remember reading about it somewhere. You can bet your ___ that if I was posting my desire to improve SH4 and focus energy towards keeping it fleetboats specific, I would be asked why I was posting it there! Also, I'm positive we can have a RFB or FTT mod that equals GWX if we just focus on that...

[Kpt. Lehmann]

1) I am a patriotic American. I have served seven years in our Army. Both of my Grandfathers served in WWII and some of their brothers (my great Uncles) served in the U.S. Navy in the Pacific theater... notably on the U.S.S. Enterprise.

I also have friends risking their lives in Iraq.

If for instance the Congolese Republic decided to invade the U.S. I'm not confused as to which side I'd fight on.

2) This has NOTHING to do with the idea of being able to visit BOTH theaters (ala IL-2 Complete edition!!!!!) within the same simulator.

3) I think American subs are cool too.

4) I LIKE ALL DIESEL SUBS... and I DON'T EVEN KNOW WHY!!! WHO CARES!!!

5) I thought that this place was supposed to be about the advancement of submarine simulations... and dare I say inspite of our differences... the "Brotherhood of Submariners!" (You know... Remember how you felt for the Russian sailors when the Kursk went down??? Did ya forget already???) The attitudes of a few individuals here suck... trying to define where one backyard ends and another begins. Look past your own nose!

6) Eventually I hope to skipper British, Italian, Russian, Japanese, and LEICHENSTEINIAN SUBS because it leads to education and enables one to see the WHOLE picture. Dragging nationalism into matters of SIMULATION is absolutely pointless and the "Church of SH4" individuals telling off the "SH3 Mobsters" is only peeing in the swimming pool. You are only shooting yourselves in both feet anyway. Thats right! Keep on shooing away experienced modding talent that might eventually be brought to bear on items that YOU are interested in.

7) Whether it is U-boats or British S-CLass subs that were represented by SH3... porting these things to SH4 is an eventuality... NOT a question mark. Accept it. It will happen whether or not you keep whining.

8) You can choose to assist, observe, or interfere... It doesn't matter... because some of us can see what this might mean for the Silent Hunter series 10 years from now... when our current PC's are snails... and our new PC's... will let you smell the deisel. Besides, even from a business standpoint, the Silent Hunter Series will need to expand to make money... and to keep fueling ALL our needs to go to sea.

Lead, follow, or get out of the way.

Now, me and my "gynormous ego" have better things to do than deal with further myopic concepts presented on this thread. We've got work to do.

[Ducimus]

Originally Posted by Alex

Personnally I don't care about your negative opinion. Just let us say we want an atlantic campaign for SH4, and that's all.
:

Truthfully i could care less how and what people mod.

My stance is a bit different.

With SH3, i didnt want another atlantic game. I wanted a game about the pacific. Instead of closing my mind to it, i embrassed it. I read and learned all that i could on the subject. I afforded the history behind it all the respect it deserved, - probably to an extreme, and have a much greater appreciation for that chapter in History that Sh3 lionizes. But now that the table is turned around to the other theater, the other submarine service, its dishearting to see that many folks here are unable, or unwilling to do the same. I guess i misjudged some people here. I thought they were more open minded. Cie la vie.

[Gizzmoe]

Thread closed. Too many of dem negative waves in here...