What gets on my nerves is trading the BBC have your say and other consent sections on other news sites by people who just see it as black and white. I'll find the links but the issue is also the warhead type. The Iranians use an older warhead of the type that hit MH17, Russia users a newer warhead on the older missile. Therefore it could perhaps put to bed the theory that Russia supplied the Buk to the rebels.
I think ask agree it was shot down by a Buk. I'm of the opinion that it was an accidental shoot down by the rebels at what they thought was a Ukrainian air force transport, given that they had shot them down previously using Buks, and this is backed up by the Ukrainians. I do not think, nor dee the logic in the Russians providing a Buk for the rebels to deliberately take out a civilian airliner. Where is the benefit? However a lot of people like to,shout that and accuse Putin himself of pulling the trigger. Buks had been stolen. Ukr admitted that, but as soon as this happened they changed their tune as the screw up suited their agenda. For Yatsenyuk to say Russia setup the whole thing is ridiculous and downright dangerous. It was a *******up. We will never find out who pulled the trigger but this move to,bring Russia to court is nuts. The only "proof" that Russia supplied the Buk seems to be pedalled by bellingcat. I'm still waiting for the USA and NATO to release the images the allegedly have.
__________________
|