Click here to access the Tanksim website
SUBSIM Radio Room Forums

BUYING GAMES, BOOKS, ELECTRONICS, and STUFF
THROUGH THIS LINK SUPPORTS SUBSIM, THANKS!

The Web's #1 BBS for all submarine and naval simulations!

Go Back   SUBSIM Radio Room Forums > General > Tanksim.com

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-26-12, 12:58 PM   #1
Sledgehammer427
PacWagon
 
Sledgehammer427's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Drinking coffee and staring at trees in Massachusetts
Posts: 2,908
Downloads: 287
Uploads: 0
Default

Thanks for the pointers, and, apologies Sky, I don't have a constant internet connection to my pc so I usually browse the forum through my cellphone, unfortunately, some of the drop down moderator menus don't work so I will have to tether into my pc for a second to unlock the resources thread.

I'm thinking about trying to become proficient in the Leo-2s and the T-72, even if I'm crewing the latter at my own risk, if its too much I will probably move into either the Challenger or the Abrams instead.

EDIT: Thread Unlocked. Sky, if you want anything deleted out of there let me know in PM
__________________
Cold Waters Voice Crew - Fire Control Officer
Cmdr O. Myers - C/O USS Nautilus (SS-168)
114,000 tons sunk - 4 Spec Ops completed
V-boat Nutcase - Need supplies? Japanese garrison on a small island in the way? Just give us a call! D4C!
Sledgehammer427 is offline  

Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-12, 02:09 PM   #2
Skybird
Soaring
 
Skybird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: the mental asylum named Germany
Posts: 42,645
Downloads: 10
Uploads: 0


Default

The T-72 is the most difficult vehicle to play, imo. I would avoid it in the beginning. The fire control is more according to WWII than to even the Leopard-1.

The Challenger is... well, the FCS is very - British, with a Playstation controller as gunner's grip. . Tough armour, though, but weaker gun/ammo than the L44 or L55. Note that eSim claims to have modelled that correctly according to the publicly available numbers - its just that people expected it to be a tougher gunner. But so far, with the debate on that going on and on, nobody was able to come up with data supporting that expectation.

The two crewable Abrams either have a 105mm, or the L44 but still no periscope for the TC. Gunner must manually confirm ammo loading, a step that is skipped in the Leos. GPS works slightly different with the optics shifting when adding lead - the Leos do not do that, instead confirm lead by a simple red light. Best uran SABOT for Abrams, third generation is rated with 850 mm RAH , versus 840 mm RAH for latest tungsten sabot for the Leo-2s. i think this summarises the major differences in the sim. Of course, the vehicles have different armour layouts as well, with small advantages for the Leopards. The tougher armoured Abrams A2SEP is not yet crewable.

Currently the only Russian MBT with thermals is the Czechs' upgraded T-72M4 - not the T80.
__________________
If you feel nuts, consult an expert.
Skybird is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-12, 02:11 PM   #3
Skybird
Soaring
 
Skybird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: the mental asylum named Germany
Posts: 42,645
Downloads: 10
Uploads: 0


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sledgehammer427 View Post
EDIT: Thread Unlocked. Sky, if you want anything deleted out of there let me know in PM
Maybe just separating the first posting with the essential info from the following postings with pics, dialogues, and the angry ending. So that the information resources just become again what they should have been, and once indeed were - information resources.
__________________
If you feel nuts, consult an expert.
Skybird is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:24 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.