Amnesty...

That was a poison pill the dems put into the bill. I don't know why that wasn't vetoed

It wasn't vetoed because Republican politicians don't really care about the issue any more than democrat ones do.
The supporterrs of the parties may make all the noise they like but the politicians know the reality.

The simple answer is Yes. After the U.S beat Mexico in the Mexican American war we firmly booted all Mexican Nationals right across the newly established border.

Bloody hell.
So was this Mexican-American war where the treaty ending it gave the option of citizenship to the mexicans on the new territory as well as recogning land ownership of mexicans or is it some fictional war you invented?

The when we later bought more land off of Mexico we did the same.

At least that is correct, under various treaties and protocols the mexicans got pretty much the same treatment under the purchases as they got after the war.....though of course Freiwillige doesn't know about those real events and got it backwards.

Whats amazingly stupid about such a "project" is that there is no safeguard. Ok - so you want to "give your vote" to someone in Ghana. All it takes is one of the "Egalitarians" to decide that all the votes were to go for a specific party - and suddenly you have a single entity controlling the votes of who knows how many.

Whats amazing about that statement is that with the process they have over in Britain, if someone from the "egalitarian" idiots were to decide all the votes were to go to one party and could manage to pull it off they would have a handfull of votes spread throughout hundreds of constituancies which would count for nothing even if they could find a "marxist" party in any of those constituancies to vote for.