Do dc's run out? (newb question warning)

[Lt.Fillipidis]

Why do i have the feeling that SH2 was a better game in worse graphics?

[Jimbuna]

Originally Posted by Red Heat

In the sh3 i dont know for sure...but in the sh2 it was implemented in the stock game for sure!

On average, each DC thrower has between 20 and thirty.

Originally Posted by Lt.Fillipidis

Why do i have the feeling that SH2 was a better game in worse graphics?

I think your in danger of wandering into a minefield here...a bit like comparing apples and pears.

Would one care to give some detailed examples.....whilst taking into account the limitations in SH2 and the additional features/platforms available to players in SH3?

[Red Heat]

Hii Jim

I full agree with you...we must see the all painting, correct?
It was a huge advance since sh2 to sh3 and im not including the GWX, U-Boat Commander, and JSGME tool...

[MRV]

SH3 is better, no discussion ;-) but there are some features I would have wanted to see in SH3, for example fire levels that add to ship damage, explosions from far away becoming a rumble and some micromanagement commands available to the player (manual control over red lighting, option to abandon your sub if surfaced....)


UBISOFT ROMANIA DID YOU READ THAT??? Thanks!

[Jimbuna]

Originally Posted by MRV

SH3 is better, no discussion ;-) but there are some features I would have wanted to see in SH3, for example fire levels that add to ship damage, explosions from far away becoming a rumble and some micromanagement commands available to the player (manual control over red lighting, option to abandon your sub if surfaced....)


UBISOFT ROMANIA DID YOU READ THAT??? Thanks!

This is precisely the old recurring theme.....no version of SH has had EVERYTHING from its predecessor included, but each successor has had more improvements included.

[Sailor Steve]

Originally Posted by Lt.Fillipidis

Why do i have the feeling that SH2 was a better game in worse graphics?

Not even close. SH2 was designed for multiplay with Destroyer Command, which was a good thing, but as a stand-alone game it was just about as bad as it gets. Everything was scripted, there was no real career mode at all. Every campaign you played was exactly the same as the last one. The list just goes on.

There were mods that turned into quite a fun game, but it could never be properly labelled a simulator.

[Ping Panther]

There are R.L. accounts of a few unfortunate subs facing nearly infinite DC engagements from escorts in situations where they made their convoy attack within reasonable round-trip range to a naval port of the enemy.

Imagine, the given number of escorts come along and send you under, ping you all over, dump their DC load all around. Then once one of them feels they are running low, they radio in, then step aside to take five, make a run to their local arsenal depot to load up, and keep tagging each other to keep bringing it on.

GWX3 is the best ever, and yes they can eventually run out of DC's. Been there, done that.

[Jimbuna]

One of the most realistic experiences during a DC attack is when it's conducted by two or more escorts and they take turns listening whilst another of their number make the attack run....incredible!!

[Red Heat]

Hello

MRV, Jimbuna, Sailor Steve...i full agree with all your points of views, in particulary what MRV exemple:

"fire levels that add to ship damage, explosions from far away becoming a rumble and some micromanagement commands available to the player (manual control over red lighting, option to abandon your sub if surfaced"

I all so miss a lot...it was very very cool!