![]() |
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Maverick Modder
![]() Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: England
Posts: 3,895
Downloads: 65
Uploads: 3
|
![]()
Okay here's a question for you Arclight. If you could choose between these, which would you choose?
1) 2GB RAM with a 640GB HDD (7200rpm, 16MB cache) 2) 4GB RAM with a 250GB HDD (7200rpm, 8MB cache) Bearing in mind that for me, the extra space on the HDD is not of benefit but the extra speed given by that space (and by the extra cache) is appealing. In my experience many games do not make good use of RAM. They tend not to preload very well, and will happily thrash the HDD when data is needed, in spite of the fact that I have (typically) a spare 1 Gb of RAM sat around doing nothing (which could have been preloaded with the data beforehand). Because of this, I'm inclined to go with option 1. Option 1 is also a bit cheaper than option 2.
__________________
Freedom of speech - priceless. For everything else there's Mastercard. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Navy Seal
![]() Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Land of windmills, tulips, wooden shoes and cheese. Lots of cheese.
Posts: 8,467
Downloads: 53
Uploads: 10
|
![]()
The second.
I think you'll get a better experience from doubling the RAM than doubling the cache on the HD. Once everything is in memory, paging is minimal. Are you looking at WD drives? You might consider a 160GB drive then, should be faster than the 250GB model. ![]()
__________________
Contritium praecedit superbia. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Maverick Modder
![]() Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: England
Posts: 3,895
Downloads: 65
Uploads: 3
|
![]()
I agree. But have you ever actually watched the memory usage of your games? Generally they will be programmed to use a certain amount and if you've got more than that certain amount then they simply won't use it, and your extra RAM is quite literally sat there doing nothing.
Quote:
![]() Edit1: The site doesn't specify the HDD manufacturer. I'll call them and ask. Edit2: I found the part of their site listing manufacturers. Apparently all their hard disks are either Seagate or WD.
__________________
Freedom of speech - priceless. For everything else there's Mastercard. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Navy Seal
![]() Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Land of windmills, tulips, wooden shoes and cheese. Lots of cheese.
Posts: 8,467
Downloads: 53
Uploads: 10
|
![]()
It's just a theory though, I'll see if I can dig something up.
Basically, most manufacturers use 250, 500, 750 etc. WD switched to 160, 320, 640 etc. It comes down to the way the platter for the drive is manufactured. Those 640GB drives are very fast, so I extend the logic to conclude those 160 (or 320) drives will have high performance as well. On memory use; depends on the game. I don't know what you usually play, but I imagine OFP2 doesn't do a proper job because it was designed to run on consoles, which obviously are pretty limited memory wise. For example, Supreme Commander can suffer a crash from exceding it's 2GB address limit, so there are definetly games that actually need all of it.
__________________
Contritium praecedit superbia. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Maverick Modder
![]() Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: England
Posts: 3,895
Downloads: 65
Uploads: 3
|
![]() Quote:
![]()
__________________
Freedom of speech - priceless. For everything else there's Mastercard. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Maverick Modder
![]() Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: England
Posts: 3,895
Downloads: 65
Uploads: 3
|
![]()
And maybe Crysis.
Just to see how nice it looks. ![]()
__________________
Freedom of speech - priceless. For everything else there's Mastercard. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Navy Seal
![]() Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Land of windmills, tulips, wooden shoes and cheese. Lots of cheese.
Posts: 8,467
Downloads: 53
Uploads: 10
|
![]() Quote:
![]() Even if 2GB is (just) enough today, you might need a little more not long from now. I'd stick with WD 320 or 640 though. ![]() Add 100-150 to that budget, and imho the overall quality of the system goes up a lot.
__________________
Contritium praecedit superbia. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Maverick Modder
![]() Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: England
Posts: 3,895
Downloads: 65
Uploads: 3
|
![]()
What is wrong with you two? Do you think money grows on trees? My budget is £600 for a reason.
If you think that the 4GB is really all that essential then suggest a lower graphics card or processor or something. From what I'm seeing, the £40 it will cost me to get the extra 2GB of RAM is going to drop my CPU/GPU specs by a massive amount - a much larger drop than can possibly be compensated for with an extra 2GB of (probably unused) RAM. The CPU/GPU looks to me to be the right place to be putting that £40, but if you have ANY evidence to the contrary then I'm all ears. I've scoured the web for (unmodded) PC games that can use 4GB and come up with diddly squat.
__________________
Freedom of speech - priceless. For everything else there's Mastercard. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Ensign
![]() Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Otopeni, Romania
Posts: 233
Downloads: 942
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
I will take:
a PSU from Corsair because they have a single powerful +12V rail. 4 gb of ram in an instant. I will go with Mushkin Ram. I used Ram from Mushkin in 3 PC-s in the last year and they work fine. Sh3 with GWX3 eats almost 700mb of ram. Add that to whatever Windows eats up and you find that 2gb is rather...low. and I have Win Xp pro 32bits. Videocard wise take a ATI 5850. It is DX11 capable. If you have more money take the 5870. A 4850X2 is powerful but limited in some games because some of them are designed in a way that those 2 VPU-s won't be used. The same thing goes sometimes for crossfire and SLI sistems. Regarding the Hdd get a SATA2 WD or Seagate or Hitachi Hdd. They are fine all of them. 500gb at least PS. £600 is not much for a gaming system. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | |
Maverick Modder
![]() Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: England
Posts: 3,895
Downloads: 65
Uploads: 3
|
![]()
@bybyx
DX11, eh? The list of current DX10 games is rather short... and even those games usually only have one little extra thing (e.g. God Rays, or Cloud Shadows) that DX10 can do and DX9 can't. I'm not sure that DX11 support is a priority for me right now. SH3+mods uses only 700Mb on your system!? ![]() ![]() Quote:
![]() If you'd like to send me some cash to help me buy a better one, I won't object.
__________________
Freedom of speech - priceless. For everything else there's Mastercard. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 | |
Ensign
![]() Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Otopeni, Romania
Posts: 233
Downloads: 942
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
Regarding the cash I believe there is a saying in UK, something like Would if i could but I can't? I am sorry but the prices in UK are way to big. However the sistem at 600 pounds is ok. You could add 2gb more in the future. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|