Click here to access the Helosim website |
The Web's #1 BBS for all submarine and naval simulations! |
|
12-23-10, 03:06 PM | #1 |
Commodore
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: U-142
Posts: 624
Downloads: 62
Uploads: 0
|
"what if"
Support or refute this statement:
WW2 could have been won by 1943 had the VVS pursued the same strategic bombing campaign as US and UK.
__________________
Support U-Boot_HAHD: Install Dropbox Click Here & Increase The Teams Dropbox space and get 2.25GB of free online Storage space for yourself. |
12-23-10, 03:14 PM | #2 |
Navy Seal
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Stavka
Posts: 8,211
Downloads: 13
Uploads: 0
|
Why do people have to post topics without giving their own opinion? Gah!
Anyway, no, it couldn't. The VVS was in a pretty bad position to launch strategic bombing attacks on important targets until well into 1944. It would also have diverted resources from its frontline aviation which was just becoming an effective force in 1943, and thus would've made the VVS considerably less effective. Not to mention the Soviets had no large strategic bomber force to draw on. There's also the questionable effectiveness of the strategic bombing campaign itself, but that's wildly debated, so I won't go into that.
__________________
Current Eastern Front status: Probable Victory |
12-23-10, 07:13 PM | #3 |
Commodore
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 624
Downloads: 87
Uploads: 0
|
And what would they use to bomb with? TB-3?
__________________
Ultima ratio regum. (The final argument of kings) - Inscription on french cannons, on order of Louis XIV |
12-24-10, 02:15 AM | #4 |
Commodore
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: U-142
Posts: 624
Downloads: 62
Uploads: 0
|
@Raptor - I actually do not think it would have worked out either; a friend and I were discussing it a few days ago and I thought I would bring it up here.
__________________
Support U-Boot_HAHD: Install Dropbox Click Here & Increase The Teams Dropbox space and get 2.25GB of free online Storage space for yourself. |
12-24-10, 07:49 AM | #5 |
Rear Admiral
|
Russians did had some decent bomber designs
like the Ilyushin DB-3, the later Ilyushin DB-3F renamed to Il-4, Petlyakov Pe-2 & Pe-8, Tupolev ANT-40 (or Tupolev-SB) & Tu-2 and the Yermolayev Yer-2. HunterICX
__________________
|
12-24-10, 07:56 AM | #6 |
Navy Seal
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Stavka
Posts: 8,211
Downloads: 13
Uploads: 0
|
Though of those only the Pe-8 and the Yer-2 were really capable of long range strategic bombing. Also, there was a lot of problems with production of the Pe-8, so it would've been hard for the VVS to gather enough of them to do any real damage.
__________________
Current Eastern Front status: Probable Victory |
12-24-10, 08:03 AM | #7 | |
Rear Admiral
|
Quote:
and iirc due the increase of Pe-8 losses from 1 every 100ish to 1 every 40-50ish sorties the ones that where still operational where pulled from Combat sorties somewhere in mid 1944 at least they wheren't used as primary combat aircraft anymore. HunterICX
__________________
|
|
|
|