Click here to access the Helosim website |
The Web's #1 BBS for all submarine and naval simulations! |
|
11-26-07, 04:09 PM | #1 |
Ocean Warrior
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Finland
Posts: 2,950
Downloads: 10
Uploads: 0
|
Any tips on BF 109?
This is the plane i love and want to be good in. Any tips or links to guides for a noob that comes first in your mind are welcomed.
I read some basics before starting flight training, i know its a boom&zoom plane. Is there anywhere stats on different models and its commont opponents, turn&climb rate etc...?:hmm: |
11-26-07, 04:13 PM | #2 |
Lucky Jack
|
many allied planes can out-turn the 109, so pretty much the only tactic is the Boom&Zoom.
|
11-26-07, 04:28 PM | #3 |
Navy Seal
|
Says he who fights in WoE in the weeds
|
11-26-07, 04:33 PM | #4 |
Lucky Jack
|
Atleast I fight in there. :p
|
11-26-07, 05:27 PM | #5 |
Sea Lord
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Under a thermal layer in chilly Olde England
Posts: 1,842
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
|
You might want to read this review of the shockwave bf109E by me, it is based closely on the characteristics of the real bf109:
http://www.avsim.com/pages/1107/bf109/bf109.htm The main plus points of it are: fuel injection so it doesn't lose power when suddenly pushed into negative G nosedives; good low speed control, owing to the automatic slats and variable flaps which can be used in combat unlike a lot of other WW2 fighters, also easier to recover from a spin than most other WW2 fighters and stalls quite gently; good concentrated firepower which rewards accurate shooting up close; small cross-section makes it slightly better for head on attacks, as you present a smaller target; well harmonised controls throughout a wide range of the flight regime; better suited to combat than most contemporary RAF fighters in the Battle of Britain owing to it's less complex engine/prop management in combat situations; it was very serviceable, an engine switch could be done in 12 minutes. The main minus points are: can be unstable in an uncoordinated turn, owing to uneven slat deployment; ammunition it fired was of a low muzzle velocity, causing cannon shells to explode on contact rather than penetrate and then explode, cockpit visibility was poor in comparison to other fighters; trickier to take-off and land than many other contemporary WW2 fighters, owing to the narrow track landing gear and CoG being quite far back when at high fuel loads, undercarriage was also a little weak; it was noisier than most other WW2 fighter in the cockpit; it had no rudder trimmer and no geared tabs, so it was tiring to fly it for long periods and it always requires a good bootful of rudder to keep it straight; the coolant system was vulnerable to enemy fire; it was hard to get it out of a high speed dive, the elevators became very heavy under high aerodynamic loads; it used 87 octane fuel as opposed to the 100 octane fuel of most Allied aircraft, making it more prone to pre-ignition; slab-sided canopy would often reflect the sun and betray its position. Chock
__________________
Last edited by Chock; 11-26-07 at 05:50 PM. |
11-28-07, 05:19 PM | #6 |
Ocean Warrior
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Finland
Posts: 2,950
Downloads: 10
Uploads: 0
|
Thank you for your replies.
I found these. http://www.virtualpilots.fi/feature/articles/109myths/ http://109lair.hobbyvista.com/index1024.htm My love gets stronger. PS. Cool pictures and paint schemes if Dowly hasnt seen them yet. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|