![]() |
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Navy Seal
![]() |
![]()
Here is a video
http://rt.com/Top_News/2010-06-15/nu...sk-launch.html Now you don't see much of the sub but I noticed it does not have a pump jet. Given it was started in 1993 and stopped for so long could be the structure was already fixed and could not be incorporated. I would expect the second one to have one considering the Borei does. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Chief of the Boat
|
![]()
Would have been nice to see more of her.
I'm probably stating the obvious but I would have thought the cost constraints at the time of construction meant doing away with the pump jet. I noticed they even cut costs on the method used to break the bottle of champagne on her bow ![]() The initial propulsion specs were: Quote:
__________________
Last edited by Jimbuna; 06-16-10 at 06:51 AM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Navy Seal
![]() |
![]() The link you posted Xabba appears to be dead. I also noticed that the 7 blade screw isn't highly skewed like on US boats. Didn't think I saw the aft missile deck for SLCMs shown in some drawings. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Navy Seal
![]() |
![]()
The prop isn't skewed at all.
Then again for the time being that could be deliberate. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Navy Seal
![]() |
![]()
As I understand it highly skewed propellers reduce cavitation along the end of the propeller blade, which makes me wonder if the Russians have developed something better to counteract that.
Or they have discovered it not as much of a problem. Or they plan to change propellers once all the press is gone. ...Darn I guess my sig might need a remake... bah I like my version of the Severodvinsk better! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
XO
![]() Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 435
Downloads: 5
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
This would be the final or very close to final design |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Navy Seal
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|