SUBSIM Radio Room Forums



SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997

Go Back   SUBSIM Radio Room Forums > Silent Hunter 3 - 4 - 5 > Silent Hunter III
Forget password? Reset here

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-09-09, 10:13 PM   #1
Oneshot/Onekill
Captain
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Drinking a cold one in Davey Jone's locker.
Posts: 487
Downloads: 26
Uploads: 0
Default The allies could of ended the U-boat war much earlier.

http://www.uboat.net/technical/batteries.htm

It absolutely dumbfounds me that after reading this that the allies, both British and American bomber commands ignored this for 4 years!

I would love to hear your comments.
Oneshot/Onekill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-09, 10:24 PM   #2
rubenandthejets
中国水兵
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 279
Downloads: 20
Uploads: 0
Default

Hindsight is 20-20.

Bomber Command had their hands full and like the article says "after the war" realised the missed opportunity.

It took the Schweinfurt ball bearing factory raid in 1943 to make the Germans realise the bottlneck in their whole war machine was this single plant, responsible for 80%+ of their production. A couple of follow up raids there would have stopped EVERYTHING by the end of 43.

Here is another missed opportunity for Bomber Command and the 8th Air Force, one they knew about but thought they'd destroyed.
__________________
HMAS Sydney III "Thorough and Ready"
rubenandthejets is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-09, 10:29 PM   #3
Oneshot/Onekill
Captain
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Drinking a cold one in Davey Jone's locker.
Posts: 487
Downloads: 26
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rubenandthejets
Hindsight is 20-20.

Bomber Command had their hands full and like the article says "after the war" realised the missed opportunity.

It took the Schweinfurt ball bearing factory raid in 1943 to make the Germans realise the bottlneck in their whole war machine was this single plant, responsible for 80%+ of their production. A couple of follow up raids there would have stopped EVERYTHING by the end of 43.

Here is another missed opportunity for Bomber Command and the 8th Air Force, one they knew about but thought they'd destroyed.
Hind sight or not, you'd have to believe that between the 8th Airforce, British bomber command, and the 9th tactical Airforce that they could of scaped a few bombers together?
Oneshot/Onekill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-09, 10:30 PM   #4
Torplexed
Let's Sink Sumptin' !
 
Torplexed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 5,823
Downloads: 43
Uploads: 0


Default

The American and British bomber campaign against Germany really didn't start to hit it's stride until 1943-44 by which point the U-Boats were already in retreat. Some debate the effectiveness of the whole Allied aerial bombing campaign to this day, (German industrial production actually increased in 1944 despite it) although it did have the nice side effect of forcing the Luftwaffe to defend German factories instead of supporting the German army.
Torplexed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-09, 10:47 PM   #5
Oneshot/Onekill
Captain
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Drinking a cold one in Davey Jone's locker.
Posts: 487
Downloads: 26
Uploads: 0
Default

I wholeheartily agree, and i do understand that the bombing campaighn didnt get to full speed until the middle to late part of the war. But after the way Churchhill saw the U-boat, and the fact that the factory was within range of early war bombers, you'd of thought ole Winston would of let the dogs out.

The amazing thing is that they(the allies) didnt even know of the factories existance untill 43!
Oneshot/Onekill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-09, 11:03 PM   #6
Torplexed
Let's Sink Sumptin' !
 
Torplexed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 5,823
Downloads: 43
Uploads: 0


Default

The problem was early in the war there weren't enough bombers to make a difference. Due to the inaccuracy of strategic bombing it took vast fleets of bombers to do any appreciable damage to a target. It's estimated that only 10% of the bombs dropped by strategic bombers actually hit their intended target and that's depending on how liberally you define a hit. Indeed sometimes in post raid assessment the Germans could not decide which town (not the installation in the town) had been the intended target because the scattering of bomb craters was so wide. Sadly, there were no Allied laser guided missiles in WW2.

Ultimately strategic bombing become more about smashing the enemy will to resist and wholesale destruction than a pin-point effort to hit specific targets.
Torplexed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-09, 12:33 AM   #7
A Very Super Market
The Old Man
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Deep in the Wild Canadian suburbs.
Posts: 1,468
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Default

Furthermore, you would need to escort the bombers there, and with the limited numbers, and little long-ranged fighters you would be throwing away your bombers for a target they might not even hurt.
__________________


The entire German garrison of Vanviken, right here in your thread!
A Very Super Market is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-09, 01:17 AM   #8
bookworm_020
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Sinking ships off the Australian coast
Posts: 5,966
Downloads: 1
Uploads: 0
Default

It was the same story with many targets in germany. The lack of bombers, not knowing of bottlenecks in the german supply chain, and so on.
bookworm_020 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-09, 09:08 AM   #9
irish1958
Ocean Warrior
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Carmel, Indiana
Posts: 3,250
Downloads: 320
Uploads: 11
Default

The bomber commands felt that the indiscriminate bombing of "targets" would "reduce the morale" of the enemy's general population, in spite of the response of the British civilian population to the Blitz. Curtis LeMay especially thought so in the face of overwhelming evidence to the contrary; and to this day, so did the American (at least civilian) command in Iraq.
The only thing that appears to work is nuclear bombing and complete destruction of whole cities in an instant.
__________________
Irish1958
irish1958 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-09, 09:16 AM   #10
Sailor Steve
Eternal Patrol
 
Sailor Steve's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: High in the mountains of Utah
Posts: 50,369
Downloads: 745
Uploads: 249


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Oneshot/Onekill
Hind sight or not, you'd have to believe that between the 8th Airforce, British bomber command, and the 9th tactical Airforce that they could of scaped a few bombers together?
"Hindsight" means they didn't know about it until they occupied the plant after the war. They can't destroy what they don't know about.

Oh, and FYI: In your title, it should be "Could Have", not "Could Of".
__________________
“Never do anything you can't take back.”
—Rocky Russo
Sailor Steve is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-09, 09:18 AM   #11
irish1958
Ocean Warrior
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Carmel, Indiana
Posts: 3,250
Downloads: 320
Uploads: 11
Default

SS
Are you sure you are not an English teacher?
__________________
Irish1958
irish1958 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-09, 09:21 AM   #12
Sailor Steve
Eternal Patrol
 
Sailor Steve's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: High in the mountains of Utah
Posts: 50,369
Downloads: 745
Uploads: 249


Default

LOL no, but with 50+ years of reading behind me I grind my teeth when I read things I think should be obvious. Not that they are obvious to everyone, just that I think so.
__________________
“Never do anything you can't take back.”
—Rocky Russo

Last edited by Sailor Steve; 03-10-09 at 11:32 AM.
Sailor Steve is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-09, 09:27 AM   #13
mookiemookie
Navy Seal
 
mookiemookie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 9,404
Downloads: 105
Uploads: 1
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by A Very Super Market
Furthermore, you would need to escort the bombers there, and with the limited numbers, and little long-ranged fighters you would be throwing away your bombers for a target they might not even hurt.
Not to mention that by using your fighters as escorts in a major bombing campaign, you'd be leaving the homeland relatively undefended in the face of the Battle of Britain.
__________________
They don’t think it be like it is, but it do.

Want more U-boat Kaleun portraits for your SH3 Commander Profiles? Download the SH3 Commander Portrait Pack here.
mookiemookie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-09, 09:33 AM   #14
Fincuan
Admiral
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Suomi, sauna, puukko, perkele
Posts: 2,346
Downloads: 39
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mookiemookie
Not to mention that by using your fighters as escorts in a major bombing campaign, you'd be leaving the homeland relatively undefended in the face of the Battle of Britain.
Not to mention the main fighter types at the time of the Battle would have to turn back a little bit a after crossing the coast of mainland Europe
Fincuan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-09, 10:10 AM   #15
Dread Knot
Ace of the Deep
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,288
Downloads: 85
Uploads: 0
Default

Not well known in the history of WW2 was the uncanny ability of concrete industrial facilities to take a licking and keep on ticking. Probably the best example was the Dzerzhinsky Tractor Works in Stalingrad which despite being bombed by the Luftwaffe, shelled by artillery and sniped at kept producing tanks that moved unpainted off the production line and straight into the battle for Stalingrad. It didn't stop producing tanks until the battle moved into the factory itself.
Dread Knot is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:57 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.