![]() |
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
![]() |
#1 |
Sea Lord
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: San Francisco, California
Posts: 1,633
Downloads: 1
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Hi Skybird,
I'm trying to remember the German phrase for the opposite of Blitzkrieg. If I remember blitzkrieg is "rapid manuever for the purpose of seizing key terrain". But I can't remember the German phrase for "rapid maneuver for the purpose of destroying troops." Any ideas?
__________________
U.Kdt.Hdb B. I. 28) This possibility of using the hydrophone to help in detecting surface ships should, however, be restricted to those cases where the submarine is unavoidably compelled to stay below the surface. http://www.hackworth.com/ |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Admiral
![]() Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,247
Downloads: 4
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Rambokrieg? Rushkrieg? Zergrush?
__________________
"Tout ce qui est exagéré est insignifiant." ("All that is exaggerated is insignificant.") - Talleyrand |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Soaring
|
![]() Quote:
Only seek&destroy comes to my mind. But obviously, that is not German, and means something slightly different. A separate phrase I know is "Grabenkrieg", which translates into "trench warfare". The German word for "war" is "Krieg", which in ancient German (Althochdeutsch) was "Chreg", and that meant "obstinacy" (Hartnäckigkeit). Is there an English word for what you mean?
__________________
If you feel nuts, consult an expert. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | ||
Sea Lord
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: San Francisco, California
Posts: 1,633
Downloads: 1
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
I think in German it might start out "verr....or vern...or verrn". Anyway, basically the author's point was that the German Army was practicing "ver....." in reducing Kiev, when they should have been practicing Blitzkrieg, driving towards Moscow. The term I am trying to think of far predates blitzkrieg, and I think may have started in the Franco-Prussian War.
__________________
U.Kdt.Hdb B. I. 28) This possibility of using the hydrophone to help in detecting surface ships should, however, be restricted to those cases where the submarine is unavoidably compelled to stay below the surface. http://www.hackworth.com/ |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |||
The Old Man
![]() Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,448
Downloads: 10
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
|
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Planesman
![]() Join Date: May 2005
Location: Wilhelmshaven, Germany
Posts: 181
Downloads: 35
Uploads: 0
|
Quote:
Vernichtungsschlacht? The most common german description for the Battle of Kiev is "Kesselschlacht". This term was used when a complete encirclement was achieved and total annihilation (=Vernichtung) of the surrounded enemy forces became the goal. During Barbarossa the Central german army group disbanded the Blizkrieg strategy (=continue the drive towards Moscow) for some time in favour of the Kiev Kesselschlacht. Hitler ordered this change in strategy because he was afraid of this massive enemy troop concentration behind the german front and decided to annihilate those. Most front commanders, like Guderian were against this strategy change because they considered this change as a waste of time and resources. Attrition = Abnutzung |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Sea Lord
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: San Francisco, California
Posts: 1,633
Downloads: 1
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Vernichtungsschlacht
Luchi you are my new hero. I am almost 100% sure that is the term I was looking for. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Thank you very much.
__________________
U.Kdt.Hdb B. I. 28) This possibility of using the hydrophone to help in detecting surface ships should, however, be restricted to those cases where the submarine is unavoidably compelled to stay below the surface. http://www.hackworth.com/ |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | ||||
Soaring
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
If you feel nuts, consult an expert. |
||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Soaring
|
![]()
Yes, Vernichtungsschlacht. But it is no real category of war theory, I think, for it is too wide and unprecise in it's meaning: every war is about destruction of the enemy, annihilation of any oppositon standing in the way of one's own goials. Whereas "Kesselschlacht" has a clear definition that describes the tactical situation of hostile forces completly surrounded and isolated and being battered until they are surrendering or are annihilated.
__________________
If you feel nuts, consult an expert. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Stowaway
Posts: n/a
Downloads:
Uploads:
|
![]()
Another word(s) for it may be the United Nations.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#11 | |
Sea Lord
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: San Francisco, California
Posts: 1,633
Downloads: 1
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
U.Kdt.Hdb B. I. 28) This possibility of using the hydrophone to help in detecting surface ships should, however, be restricted to those cases where the submarine is unavoidably compelled to stay below the surface. http://www.hackworth.com/ |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Grey Wolf
![]() Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Germany
Posts: 936
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Maybe it has allready been answered, but I'd say "Vernichtungskrieg" (war of anihilation).
But I am not sure wether this term is really contemporary, meaning actually used during WW2 or having been invented after WW2 to describe the eastern front. Regarding US WW2 strategy, the term "Abnutzungskrieg" was used (war of attrition) while soldiers called it "der Krieg des reichen Mannes" (rich man's way of war).
__________________
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|