US Republicans seize lower house

Gerald · 11-03-10, 07:15 AM

US Republicans win control of the lower house of Congress in key elections, setting up a new challenge to President Barack Obama's agenda.

* Mark Mardell: Voters punish Obama
* The new rulers of the House
* Boehner emotional at victory Watch
* In pictures: US Election results
* Republican joy in Chicago
* As it happened: US mid-terms
* Pundits' views on what next
* Gratitude from victorious Reid Watch

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-11684522

Note:3 November 2010 Last updated at 11:42 GMT

papa_smurf · 11-03-10, 07:35 AM

This has been interesting to watch from a non-US perspective. Does this mean President Obama will find it difficult getting laws passed? Will the Republicans try to block new legislation or not risk it, as that might dent their chances of getting into power in 2 years time

Still, much more interesting than the bunch we got

Gerald · 11-03-10, 07:44 AM

Mr. Obama, has a veto, which I suppose it could be beneficial

papa_smurf · 11-03-10, 07:46 AM

Quote:

Mr. Obama, has a veto, which I suppose it could be beneficial

Like when the UK had one in the early days of the EU, where we would veto everything no matter what time of day is was

.

Oberon · 11-03-10, 07:51 AM

Gloating from obvious sources begins in five...four...three...

NeonSamurai · 11-03-10, 08:04 AM

Ya lets widen the gulf between parties even more and make each side even more rabid and extreme

Honestly I think American politics have gotten way more polarized in the last 20 years. With less critical thinking going on, and more blind backing your chosen religion.. I mean party.

Here in Canada it's the exact opposite, where voter apathy rules and we don't trust or like any of the candidates very much. Sure there are some dyed in the wool liberals and conservatives, but not that many.

tater · 11-03-10, 08:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by papa_smurf

This has been interesting to watch from a non-US perspective. Does this mean President Obama will find it difficult getting laws passed? Will the Republicans try to block new legislation or not risk it, as that might dent their chances of getting into power in 2 years time

Still, much more interesting than the bunch we got

The Senate is still dem, but much important stuff will need both houses in agreement.

The net result is nothing sweeping can possibly come from Obama except if it is liked by the Republicans. Sadly, in the first 2 years he set up stuff where unelected regulators will set policies that can still fubar the country (much of the real problem with the healthcare bill is that the specifics were not passed, but they set up things so huge changes could come later with no votes at all by people appointed).

The country would have been better off with this kind of gridlock for the whole Obama admin (not to mention Obama would be better off, because he would have had to been centrist to pass anything.)

AVGWarhawk · 11-03-10, 09:02 AM

The people(country) have spoken. Obama needs to govern from the center. Just as he stumped in 2008.

August · 11-03-10, 09:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by papa_smurf

Does this mean President Obama will find it difficult getting laws passed? Will the Republicans try to block new legislation or not risk it, as that might dent their chances of getting into power in 2 years time

If the Republicans are smart they will do more than be obstructionist. In two years they will need to be able to show that they came up with some ideas themselves, even if the Senate Dems and White House block them.

SteamWake · 11-03-10, 09:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Oberon

Gloating from obvious sources begins in five...four...three...

No time for gloating the work is just getting started.

It is time to hold these jokers feet to the fire and make sure they act in the manner they promised us.

I am really dissapointed about Reid's race thouth. I guess they managed to demonize Angle and surround themselves with last minute union orginzation. How that guy is still in office is beyond me.

nikimcbee · 11-03-10, 10:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by August

If the Republicans are smart they will do more than be obstructionist. In two years they will need to be able to show that they came up with some ideas themselves, even if the Senate Dems and White House block them.

Dude, you guys re-elected Barney Frank, waz up with that?

tater · 11-03-10, 10:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nikimcbee

Dude, you guys re-elected Barney Frank, waz up with that?

Who knows. Anyone actually watch his appalling victory speech? What a disgusting boor. His whole speech rang of entitlement. Seems peeved he even had to run. Useless POS.

gimpy117 · 11-03-10, 10:28 AM

to be honest, nothing will get done. Democratic executive branch, democratic senate; and republican house

that spells out deadlock to me

August · 11-03-10, 10:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nikimcbee

Dude, you guys re-elected Barney Frank, waz up with that?

My state is infested with Democrats and the state GoP is kept weak by crossover primary votes. It's a sad situation. He's not my congresscritter though. Different district.

tater · 11-03-10, 10:59 AM

The media needs to switch the colors. If they can't get the right colors assigned, then each election should switch red and blue. Why? Reds are the bad guys. The choice of red for reps by the media is no accident. Red=bad in military exercises, for example, and the side closer to the Reds are the democrats (not all democrats are communists, but all communists existing within our two party system are democrats).

11-03-10, 07:15 AM	#1
Gerald SUBSIM Newsman Join Date: May 2008 Location: Close to sea Posts: 24,254 Downloads: 553 Uploads: 0	US Republicans seize lower house US Republicans win control of the lower house of Congress in key elections, setting up a new challenge to President Barack Obama's agenda. * Mark Mardell: Voters punish Obama * The new rulers of the House * Boehner emotional at victory Watch * In pictures: US Election results * Republican joy in Chicago * As it happened: US mid-terms * Pundits' views on what next * Gratitude from victorious Reid Watch http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-11684522 Note:3 November 2010 Last updated at 11:42 GMT __________________ Nothing in life is to be feard,it is only to be understood. Marie Curie

11-03-10, 07:35 AM	#2
papa_smurf Ocean Warrior Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: High Peak, Derbyshire Posts: 2,851 Downloads: 33 Uploads: 0	This has been interesting to watch from a non-US perspective. Does this mean President Obama will find it difficult getting laws passed? Will the Republicans try to block new legislation or not risk it, as that might dent their chances of getting into power in 2 years time Still, much more interesting than the bunch we got __________________

11-03-10, 07:44 AM	#3
Gerald SUBSIM Newsman Join Date: May 2008 Location: Close to sea Posts: 24,254 Downloads: 553 Uploads: 0	Mr. Obama, has a veto, which I suppose it could be beneficial __________________ Nothing in life is to be feard,it is only to be understood. Marie Curie

11-03-10, 08:04 AM	#6
NeonSamurai Ocean Warrior Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: Socialist Republic of Kanadia Posts: 3,044 Downloads: 25 Uploads: 0	Ya lets widen the gulf between parties even more and make each side even more rabid and extreme Honestly I think American politics have gotten way more polarized in the last 20 years. With less critical thinking going on, and more blind backing your chosen religion.. I mean party. Here in Canada it's the exact opposite, where voter apathy rules and we don't trust or like any of the candidates very much. Sure there are some dyed in the wool liberals and conservatives, but not that many. __________________ SH3 Newbie Guide Links and other helpfull stuff

11-03-10, 09:02 AM	#8
AVGWarhawk Lucky Jack Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: In a 1954 Buick. Posts: 28,253 Downloads: 90 Uploads: 0	The people(country) have spoken. Obama needs to govern from the center. Just as he stumped in 2008. __________________ “You're painfully alive in a drugged and dying culture.” ― Richard Yates, Revolutionary Road

11-03-10, 07:51 AM	#5
Oberon Lucky Jack Join Date: Jul 2002 Posts: 25,976 Downloads: 61 Uploads: 20	Gloating from obvious sources begins in five...four...three...

11-03-10, 10:28 AM	#13
gimpy117 Ocean Warrior Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Kalamazoo, MI Posts: 3,243 Downloads: 108 Uploads: 0	to be honest, nothing will get done. Democratic executive branch, democratic senate; and republican house that spells out deadlock to me __________________ Member of the Subsim Zombie Army

11-03-10, 10:59 AM	#15
tater Navy Seal Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: New Mexico, USA Posts: 9,023 Downloads: 8 Uploads: 2	The media needs to switch the colors. If they can't get the right colors assigned, then each election should switch red and blue. Why? Reds are the bad guys. The choice of red for reps by the media is no accident. Red=bad in military exercises, for example, and the side closer to the Reds are the democrats (not all democrats are communists, but all communists existing within our two party system are democrats).