![]() |
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
![]() |
#1 |
Seaman
![]() Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 35
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
I've got the renown saved that I can go to an IX Uboot, and it seems like with the increased speed and loadout there are only advantages to going to a type IX. Are there any drawbacks?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Ocean Warrior
![]() |
![]()
Hi mate! it has longer diving times,and are a bit more sluggish that the smaller VII boats.. But the long range & loadout compensates for that!
__________________
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Sea Lord
![]() Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,778
Downloads: 32
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
The Type IX dives like an old man with arthritis settling into a tub of cold jello. Other than that....
__________________
"You will take on England wherever you find her ships, and you will break her power at sea." --Iron Coffins, Herbert A. Werner http://kennethmarkhoover.com |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Electrician's Mate
![]() Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 138
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
If you haven't done it yet try it for sure. What's the worst that could happen?
:hmm: |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Rear Admiral
![]() |
![]()
Cons:
Slower dive time. Slightly less manuverable underwater. Slighly less underwater endurance. Pros: Faster surface speed More torpedo load Greater range allowing you to reach distant places. (some of which can be quite lucrative) Uses: The type 9 was designed primarly as a solitary hunter operating in remote waters. It is not a boat meant to use in wolfpack operations (IE, North atlantic). Its greatest assets are being able to reach distant waters and be able to operate there for a reasonable length of time. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Admiral
![]() Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: PQ AN 25
Posts: 2,178
Downloads: 70
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
![]() Umm...thats a way of puttin' it I guess! :rotfl:
__________________
SH3+GWX SH5+WoS Still Sailing....still Deep ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Planesman
![]() Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 186
Downloads: 13
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Another drawback, and a huge one for me, is that the IX makes it incredibly difficult to raid ports, just like the XXI.
And since GWX has some amazingly lucrative ports, this is a major con for me. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Navy Seal
![]() Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Docked on a Russian pond
Posts: 7,072
Downloads: 2
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
After 8 profitable patrols in a VIIB, got killed on 3rd patrol in a IXB
![]() Still, got a new life, again in a IXB. Some people never learn ![]() And yeah, the IX boats settle like warm goulash on a lazy afternoon.
__________________
Espionage, adventure, suspense, are just a click away Click here to look inside Brag's book: Amazon.com: Kingmaker: Alexey Braguine: Books Order Kingmaker here: http://www.subsim.com/store.html For Tactics visit:http://www.freewebs.com/kielman/ ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
Rear Admiral
![]() |
![]() Quote:
![]() That's Durban harbor with a liner the the background in that picture BTW. Go find that on the map, your not gonna get there in a type7. Seriously, while the type 9 turns slower then a type7 underwater, its NOWHERE near as bad as a type21. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Lucky Jack
![]() |
![]()
The IX is wonderful. Long patrols. Plenty of torps. I did not like it at first but after you keep finding more torpedos to load stuck in her bilge and ships are sinking around you one after the other, you love it!
__________________
“You're painfully alive in a drugged and dying culture.” ― Richard Yates, Revolutionary Road |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 | |
The Old Man
![]() Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Oldham, Lancs,England
Posts: 1,312
Downloads: 82
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Seaman
![]() Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 35
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Is it possible to raid harbors in unmodded SH3?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 | |
Ocean Warrior
![]() Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Reading UK
Posts: 3,473
Downloads: 90
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
![]() http://www.thegreywolves.com/ http://wolvesatwar.com/ Download GWX and other goodies: http://hosted.filefront.com/melnibonian |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 | ||
Seaman
![]() Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 35
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
I honestly don't know enough about shipbuilding etc. in those days for an answer, but I do know some sunken BBs from Pearl Harbor were raised to fight, as well as the Graf Zeppelin aircraft carrier, which the Soviets raised and refloated in 1946. |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
Ocean Warrior
![]() Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Reading UK
Posts: 3,473
Downloads: 90
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
I'm not an expert but I think it's all about money and time. If a ship has received so much damage that will cost a fortune to raise it and a huge amount of time to fix it, then there is no point really. You just raise it (to unblock the harbour), you scrap it and use the metal to make a new one.
__________________
![]() http://www.thegreywolves.com/ http://wolvesatwar.com/ Download GWX and other goodies: http://hosted.filefront.com/melnibonian |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|