View Single Post
Old 07-26-17, 09:22 PM   #33
Shadriss
A-ganger
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Hooper, UT
Posts: 80
Downloads: 89
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Destex View Post
...
Second, that mast is small and can't contain a lot of nodes which are necessary for signal strength interpolation - the basis of bearing measurement. As much as the nodes are fewer and smaller the bearing analysis is less accurate.
You're mixing things up there. Signal Strength is NOT an indication of bearing... it's an indication of how strong the signal is compared to background. Kind of a Radio version of Sonar's SNR values. You can have an extremely low SS and still get very accurate bearings. What SS will NOT give you is a range estimate. As I hinted at, there have been a few collisions at sea that were caused, in part, by operators assuming that lower SS equated to more distant contacts, that that is not always a true statement.

Now, needing multiple receptors for bearing accuracy is a true thing - that's basic beamforming, and those principles work the same way for radio and sound waves. So, going back to some of my earlier comments on this, depending on the ESM suite and equipment installed, bearings can be taken from the system with some degree of accuracy.
__________________
STS1(SS) USN (Ret) : 1997 - 2017
USS MICHIGAN (SSBN-727 BLUE)
USS MONTPELIER (SSN-765)
IMF PACNORWEST
USS ALASKA (SSBN-732 GOLD)
USS ALABAMA (SSBN-731 GOLD)
NAVAL OCEAN PROCESSING FACILITY, WHIDBEY ISLAND
USS TENNESSEE (SSBN-734 GOLD)
Shadriss is offline   Reply With Quote