View Single Post
Old 09-29-09, 12:59 PM   #51
Captain Vlad
Seasoned Skipper
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Pollard, Oklahoma
Posts: 679
Downloads: 6
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ETR3(SS) View Post
So what I've seen this thread boil down to is this. You have the couple of people who have been in the navy, been on a submarine, saying what the women are likely to do and how it would realistically impact the fleet. On the other hand you have the people who haven't been in the navy, who haven't served on a submarine, who don't see the problem with it. Guess you just gotta have a little first hand knowledge of Navy women to know whats gonna happen.
And I guess you have to be a little removed from military 'culture' to realize just how much anyone in uniform tends to bitch about change in what they see as 'the way it ought to be', no matter how many long-term advantages it offers.

Ya' griped about female fighter pilots, but it worked. Ya' griped about female surface ship officers, but it worked. Etc etc etc.

But that's the secret of the US military: get its members to stop griping, and they can make anything work. Step one is always a challenge though.
__________________
"Stop sounding battlestations just to hear the alarm."
Captain Vlad is offline   Reply With Quote