SUBSIM Radio Room Forums - View Single Post

Polak2 · 11-23-20, 06:07 PM

In the recent few days, the Tank Crew forum has quite a robust discussion about the current status of TC.
Here:
https://forum.il2sturmovik.com/topic...isappointment/

The title of the thread more or less sums up what are the prevailing sentiments.

Major complaints are about poor AI and lack of content. Comparisons are drawn with Panzer Elite and Tiger vs. T34. Not sure why Steel Fury is not mentioned more often, but this is maybe because the talk is about content, continuity between scenarios, and some sort of campaign.

I cannot comment on any of the merits of those complaints, but having briefly tried most of the available WW2 tank sims I was hoping for the continuation and more vigorous development of TC as it seems to me that this som has the greatest potential. I hope the TC developers will continue making TC better.

11-23-20, 06:07 PM	#7
Polak2 Weps Join Date: May 2005 Posts: 371 Downloads: 60 Uploads: 0	In the recent few days, the Tank Crew forum has quite a robust discussion about the current status of TC. Here: https://forum.il2sturmovik.com/topic...isappointment/ The title of the thread more or less sums up what are the prevailing sentiments. Major complaints are about poor AI and lack of content. Comparisons are drawn with Panzer Elite and Tiger vs. T34. Not sure why Steel Fury is not mentioned more often, but this is maybe because the talk is about content, continuity between scenarios, and some sort of campaign. I cannot comment on any of the merits of those complaints, but having briefly tried most of the available WW2 tank sims I was hoping for the continuation and more vigorous development of TC as it seems to me that this som has the greatest potential. I hope the TC developers will continue making TC better.