Thank you.
Actually, I tried scaling it based on the proportions - but that didn't seem to work so well. What I ended up doing was compressing*/repositioning it until various pre-calculated results [mostly] matched up.
I must admit, though, that I'm not entirely sure that I got it just right. That's why I'd be very interested in anyone's test results.
*Counter intuitively, the distance scale needs to be compressed rather than stretched.
|