View Single Post
Old 03-21-17, 04:26 PM   #24
jaop99
Loader
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Cancun, Mexico
Posts: 87
Downloads: 26
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by p7p8 View Post
I think it is not true. Nuke warhead would be much more destructive to your Akula III from 120-180 yds. 45% of damage is not "massive".
Simple maths, ot they are nukes or they cant damage my boat at all with a 210kg conventional warhead explotion at 120-180 yds. Period. Have you read any of the posts about the damage of the depth charges in the WWII in this thread?.

Citing Wikipedia:

"Although the explosions of the standard United States 600 lb (270 kg) Mark 4 and Mark 7 depth charge used in World War II were nerve-wracking to the target, an U-boat’s undamaged pressure hull would not rupture unless the charge detonated closer than about 15 ft (4.6 m). Placing the weapon within this range was entirely a matter of chance and quite unlikely as the target maneuvered evasively during the attack. Most U-boats sunk by depth charges were destroyed by damage accumulated from a long barrage rather than by a single charge. Many survived hundreds of depth charges over a period of many hours; U-427 survived 678 depth charges fired against it in April 1945."

https://www.reddit.com/r/AskHistoria...arges_in_wwii/

Last edited by jaop99; 03-21-17 at 05:22 PM.
jaop99 is offline   Reply With Quote