>> We should get the updated files. My RA from subguru seems to be working fine so far, but i havnt tested the k27. Everything else seems good,, and dare i say after a little testing, almost better than alfa tau, but its still early. They have the Halifax class FFG, but they dont know their Canadain Naval very well, the model isnt right but
for at least trying to get it in there, mostly. Alot of new units as with Alfa Tau, not sure which has more. But now im stuck with one to stick with and get the rest of you to make missions for
, and for myself. More surface options in alfa tau, also more "rounded" where as RA is highly russian. Even crew voices, which im not fully a fan off because its nice to know what they are saying, although im sure the modders thought the same thing about english.
> Before i or anyone sets to work on missions and such, i thing that "we" ( the subsim forums and people ) should find out which is the best overall, so that we have missions that 90 of us can use not that we start making missions for RA, Alfa tau and all all at once. That is if anyone is interested in making more and posting them as i am for Alfa Tau.
> And last but not least, which has the better doc and AI? I know Alfa Tau is based on LWAMI, so its good, but im not sure about RA. Like the rest of you, i want only the best in my simulations.