Well then Mikhayl, I'm not sure I made my point with you. I already said I know that there are newspapers with various views regarding Emanuel. I don't mind you posting those articles. I simply watched Emanuel during the Clinton administration when Clinton was selling out Israeli security for some proposed and very much hoped for "peace". Some of these proposals did not increase Israeli security and violence looked to be the end product. I have yet to see Emanuel as a rep. condemn these "proposals" even though they were not good for Israel. I have no doubt Emanuel has an affinity towards Israel. But his actions and lack of words on some of these events show me that he is first and foremost securing ideology against an allies security. Doesn't matter how many internet articles you post about the man. His actions and words (or lack thereof) are much greater indication of this. I don't need an opinion in a news article to tell me what opinion I should have of this guy.
I'm both worried about Israeli, and European security with this new administration in Washington. A little concern for our East Asian allies. Although I do believe Emanuel is a pretty tough guy. And I don't believe he wants Israel to be threatened. But like I said, he is more beholden to party and ideology by action and words. post a million articles. Wont change a thing. Only Emanuel through words and deeds can do that. Got it?
|