SUBSIM Radio Room Forums - View Single Post

LZBTD · 10-30-08, 01:15 PM

[quote=Wreford-Brown][quote=sonar_PL]XXI in 1939? Lol.

I absolutely 100% agree with you. There is nothing remotely realistic about an XXI in 1939.

I agree that a type XXI is not historically accurate BUT consider this..IF Herr Schickelgruber had'nt considered himself the greatest military tactician since Alexander, perhaps Doenitz would have had his 200 or so subs in 1939, the ME262 probably operational as a fighter not a bomber 2 years earlier and of course taking on Uncle Joe was a serious miscalculation etc etc. So!!!!!!
So the type21 could have appeared earlier...scary isn't it.

10-30-08, 01:15 PM	#6
LZBTD Seaman Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: NORFOLK UK Posts: 42 Downloads: 33 Uploads: 0	[quote=Wreford-Brown][quote=sonar_PL]XXI in 1939? Lol. I absolutely 100% agree with you. There is nothing remotely realistic about an XXI in 1939. I agree that a type XXI is not historically accurate BUT consider this..IF Herr Schickelgruber had'nt considered himself the greatest military tactician since Alexander, perhaps Doenitz would have had his 200 or so subs in 1939, the ME262 probably operational as a fighter not a bomber 2 years earlier and of course taking on Uncle Joe was a serious miscalculation etc etc. So!!!!!! So the type21 could have appeared earlier...scary isn't it.