Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Stealth Hunter
Then I (reprising this) should have said your opinions generally follow the opinions of FOX News, and you would feel quite welcome and at home if you were to begin keeping up and along with them more.
I imply, I don't label here and now.
|
I don't like someone making opinions for me. Anyone can do that, so i would not feel at home reading Fox on a daily, or even weekly basis. Too much BS thrown in the middle to stick with one news cast. I however don't care much for CNN since it is influenced by Hillary's holdings in the parent company, and I have no idea what bug crawled up the NYT's you know what - they have the easiest articles to pick apart on the planet. Outside of that, I like to read most anything, and then I like to pick it apart based on reality. That's the fun part.
If you read most stories, they are lacking key details. Case in point is this thread - it was stated that Palin never overstepped her authority by the chief investigator (A key detail lacking from CNN's report) - though I held off on that detail waiting for everyone to put their foot in their mouths!
:p They all fell into the trap. Too easy.
But all that is besides the point. The real meat is, if you had an Ex brother in law that you didn't like, that might be good enough to get rid of him simply for being an Ex brother in law. You are hampering the jobs of both positions due to the awkward situation to start with, not to mention one party has authority over the other - any large company in this situation, particularly the lower ranked Ex brother in law would be expected to step down or transfer from the position. Not a healthy work environment if you don't already get along, and even if you do, it still might be unethical. Same mentality goes for superiors directly responsible for their lovers - its a bad work ethic. No larger company would tolerate it - ever.
This is what happened here.
Now you might get where I am coming from.
-S