Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Frame57
Not really! This is a symptom and not necessarily one that deals with religion. I feel morals are aside from religion this is why we have laws. But if you check that indeed what i have said is true. Perhaps another thread would be required for the child molester issue, but I feel strongly that any candidate not just Palen will be attacked by amoralsist. The progressives in the US embrace the doctrines of the EU which are precisely the people that attack our American history and any and all that have faith and morals. It is just that folks of religion tend to stand up for morals so they get the brunt of these arguments. I make no apologies for our attacked pledge of allegiance or that our sworn in officials place their hand over the bible. Palen has her rights in this country to practice her faith a faith that I am sure the likes of many will attack. But do note that she is not running a faith based campaign by no measure, but it is the attack dogs that are bringing up these issues not the GOP. It is also interesting to note that here that the arguments are from mostly non US residents. Case and point....  |
judging by the level of barbarism and brutlaity conducted in the name of rtelgions and institutionalised morality, I have a pricnipla problem with state,ments saying people who do not blindly take something invisible and unchecked as the ultimate truth - are amoral morons. To use Pat's words: that is like being called "yellow" by a bunczh of bananas. regarding relgions, give me evidence, then I must not stupidly beloieve some tale being told, but then I know. If you cannot do it, keep thy relgion to thyself and don't stand in my way and don't stick your nose in other people's business.
That simple.
But if you go on campaign with your religion and turn it into a fairground attraction, do not complain for beeing stared and poked all day. And do not expect people to step aside when you come along just because you are "religious". What you believe inside the four walls of your home, is of no interest for me. How you pray and what you imagine your relation to some invisible rabbit to be, is of no interest for anybody. but where you think you must spread your belief and impose it onto others or soceity in general, you become an invader of the freedom of others, and an agressor. No surprise then if peopole not sharing your ideas raise resistance to you.
On your claims being true:
churches are empty, that is true. church dogmas have failed to convince many people. This does not mean that thes epeople turnign away, are amoral, or are not "searching". but possibole that your answers simply are not good enough to convince their thinking minds. Your claim that all those people are fearing morals and are moralphobic, is nonsense. that pedophilia'S legal status is linked to this immorality because of lacking church memberships, is nonsense (mind you of the american churche's recehnt sex scandals abiut absuing children). And your claim regarding beastiality - also is nonsense in the context it was given.
Just wildly throwing around some provoking terms and labels - is no argument pro or contra anything.