Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Skybird
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Thomen
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Von Tonner
Yet she has no problem with wanting to reintroduce creationism as a subject in public schools.
Quote:
|
Republican vice-presidential candidate sarah palin wants creationism taught in science classes. In a 2006 gubernatorial debate, the soon-to-be governor of Alaska said of evolution and creation education, "Teach both. You know, don’t be afraid of education. Healthy debate is so important, and it’s so valuable in our schools. I am a proponent of teaching both."
|
http://www.thelangreport.com/religio...ght-in-school/ |
According to your quote, she does not has a problem with teaching evolution either. |
I have a problem with somebody who thinks creationism is of that intellectual quality that it should be taught side by side with scientific theopries in public school although the state has a constitutional obligation not to support any religion'S views and interests and to make sure the principle of secularism is obeyed - by all. |
Now that is funny, Sky. As a matter of fact it is both taught in Germany, is it not? Strangely it seems, there are no such problems.But the kids and the parents have the right to opt out of the religion part.
I am for teaching both, with the chance to opt out. Give people the chance to decide for themselves. Forbidding one and favoring the other because it is more sound is exactly what many people do not want: Being told what they have to believe.
Hypocrisy FTW.