I also got fed up with biased articles in Times. I guess I will cancel my subscription once it's over
Although the majority of the audience is Americans, I can't tolerate any biased reports on China, for the sake of fairness.
I was so upset after viewing a report of angry Beijing people for the poor handling of relocation work and the arrangements. Now, it's not the content itself that make me upset, as I do know this problem, but the editor says the Chinese name of the package to leave Beijing during the preiod of Beijing olympic has a word "tao" which rhymes with the word for condom. Although this is a fact I don't know why the editor has to say this, except in a poor attempt to smear the image of China and Chinese government.
(due to copyright concern I can't give the proof, which is a scanning of the magazine article)
Simply because you are sleeping on a blue bedsheet does not imply, in anyway, that you are sleeping on the excretory product of bulls.
Another article deals with the sport facilities that does the training of Chinese atheletes. In the article, they say that the people that is arranged to meet with Times reporter as "propaganda officer". I must say that, although the Chinese word for 宣傳 has possible English meanings, in this case, that word should be translated to "promotional" rather than propaganda. And why would the central government allow a sport facilities to deal with propaganda stuff? Simple negligence of truth and another patheptic attempt to backmail China, in order to attract USA audience
I guess I can do nothing except to cancel the subscription
__________________
Romeo is here, but where is Juliet?
The 中国水兵 (Chinese Sailor) in subsim
|