Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Bashou0
So,why don't FINISH it..??!! Give it a meaning, a purpose. And if that take's another year, well so be it, we are paying, aren't we..?
[...] it's indeed childish because this could be a absolute TOPgame...
|
I agree that SH4 could be better if more development time had been spend on it. I think that goes for every computer game I have ever played (with the possible exception of Ultima Underworld 2 which was simply perfect).
Game developers are here to make money though (which I definitely don't blame them for). They are not in it for purpose or meaning or for making absolute TOPgames. They're here to make money.
At some point sinking more money into a game that has probably sold the majority of the copies it will sell just isn't gonna pay any more.
I absolutely agree with you that the game
could be better. I don't see the point of debating it though:
"<blank> would be better with unlimited time, resources and funding" pretty much applies no matter what you throw in as <blank>. An equally valid statement could be that the game would have been less good if it had only had half the budget.
My point is that you are up against reality here. So am I it appears as I have just sprayed a piping hot cup of coffee all over the place! Fortunately most of it missed my keyboard.
Just my 0.02