View Single Post
Old 07-10-08, 06:35 PM   #15
PeriscopeDepth
Sea Lord
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Pacific NW
Posts: 1,894
Downloads: 6
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by geetrue
Quote:
Originally Posted by PeriscopeDepth
Quote:
Originally Posted by SUBMAN1
Quote:
Originally Posted by PeriscopeDepth
Quote:
Originally Posted by geetrue
They would have to start all over again by over throwing the present regime and installing a pro-western president and cabinet.
We tried that already in 1953. Now look at where we are.

PD
It worked for a long time! Why not again?

-S
Because it is a ridiculously short sighted, hypocritical, dangerous excuse for a real foreign policy?

PD
What was that Japanese emperor's name back in 45?
Emperor Hirohito I think ... Japan got the hint, unconditional surrender
After we killed 3+% of their population. After we nuked them. After we stationed ~350K-400K (Including Brits, Aussies, New Zealand and whatnot) troops /when there wasn't even an insurgency worth noting/ to ensure nobody "tried anything". Yes, then they submitted unconditionally and we put a government there without anybody having the will to resist.

And we can't do that anymore. Not without a draft and the public widely backing a war. Bin Laden killed more American civilians than any Axis power and how many troops were stationed in Afghanistan?

Apples and oranges.

PD
PeriscopeDepth is offline   Reply With Quote