I have read it, sky..
I have to be blunt..
I am shocked by the amount of b..cks in that paper. Like everything, I guess, when you touch modern politics. Unite the people, let's do it together, vote this.. ??
"The wording of the referendum would have to be sufficiently clear to allow voters to reach a decision on the EU's future direction.
With luck and commitment, a two-speed Europe could emerge from such a vote -- "
:rotfl:
Let's think about the worker 8-5 in some shipyard, working like a maniac, and then holding his strength and commitment to vote for.. what? Ah, ok.. :rotfl:
The thing that amazes me the most, is that all of you talk about the fact that lisabon whatever thing is hard to understand for the voters. How come 29(if I am not mistaken) states chose that? :rotfl: One didn't?
And now, when you had agreement that if one state doesn't accept it you don't have it.. Or it was shurely an accident.. Sarkozy said it, must be true..
How to put is short?
It is not coincidence lots of states voted yes, one didn't.. Or accident.. It is just a matter of making a thing that will confront and conflict nations until they together miraclelously find a solution to the problem(one of the ways and shortest):
"proposal that Europeans be allowed to directly elect an EU president goes well beyond the timid Lisbon Treaty."
:rotfl:
As I said, democracy is a fiction. It makes a modern man, strapped in the net of surveillance, jobs, computers, whatever think he has a vote.It has no difference in history, you had people flying with a sword to hunt you, you now have banks and clerks with a much more bruttish weapon, they take everything..
"In the end, they are left with no choice but to allow the peoples to decide for themselves."
:rotfl: :rotfl: :rotfl: :rotfl: :rotfl: :rotfl:
What a bunch of crap! To allow what? Further accidents?
Sorry, mate, but when you talk about modern politics, the only thing you should not do, is to talk in gloves.. They maybe act that way, but that way shure ain't polite!
Anyways, again
Cheers!