Quote:
Originally Posted by Hitman
Quote:
How certain are you about that 6.25 degrees? Or I should say, I am curious how you derived at that.
|
I got it from a german WW2 Periscope Manual  The scale there was 10/16 of a degree per mark, and the "100" mark was 6.25 degrees and the example showed a ship at 250 metres. So I investigated a bit why that figure was chosen and soon understood that because tan 6.25 = 0,10 it made sense to get range figures. Actually, 5.75 degrees would be evn more accurat but apparently the rest of the scale wouldn't then be evenly distributed.
|
Be carefull there, tan 6.25 is 0.1095, so more like 0.11, not 0.1. Maybe the majority of german officers would not care of the differenc, but a german instrument-maker would not do this! There must be more than meets the eye about this 6.25 degrees value. Some clever reason. As far as I know, (which isn't much more than common sense) for practical use of that scale it doesn't really matter how many degrees it actually is, as long as it matches an easy to use mastheight/distance ratio. I mean, my second post above describes how I would have made it. But I'm not german!
This real life scope image shows there is indeed more than meets the eye. Good spotting.

On the vertical scale there are 4 spaces above the upper number 10 and 5 spaces below it, which is again repeated (NOT mirrored) below the middle centerline (I do not understand what you mean with 3 marks, did you miss-count?). And those divisions are matched on the horizontal scale. So your (later) sketch isn't an exact match. There must be some special user-instructions on how to use that peculiar division of spaces. I do not see how, other than that the scales could be/had to be rotated to get AOB. But that only explains why horizontal is the same as vertical, it still leaves 4 vs 5 spaces issue. I'm puzzled. Very! ... Maybe I need to sleep.
Hmm, can't you persuade a still living Uboot captain for an interview about this?

Just kidding.