Again you are twisting the facts. There are two petitions. One initial, and now it is being done again. Again, scientists are signing it like mad. So maybe you simply have your facts wrong.
And, the petition thread is in another thread by the way. This thread seeks to analyze the facts based on the video and paper as presented in the first post in this thread.
Have you found an inaccuracy in the data? This is what we are after here. So far, not one post you have posted goes after the data. It goes on attacks of the man who wrote the data.
You know they say an argument is lost the moment one attacks the man presenting it and not the data. Get used to it already. Not sure why you keep harping on the same crap - it means nothing as compared to reality and what is presented here in this thread. If the guy is such a whack job as you say, it should be easy to discredit his work. :p
-S
__________________
 
|