Quote:
Originally Posted by XabbaRus
Well according to the National Academy of Sciences it has never been peer reviewed (by them) and that it was written in the style of a National Academy Proceedings publication.
|
Haven't we had this same topic one, or one and a half year ago, with Avon Lady? Carbondioxide and the claimed benefit for the planet? Something called oregon institute or something like that? Thousands of scientists being claimed of having signed it - but nobody of them knowing that he did, and a project leader for that petition who was of questionable credibility, and even had no scientific credibility? I tried to search and find the thread again, but I did not find the thread. I am sure it is there, since there I had posted the links that shreddered that "project".
No need to repeat myself here, then. I'm out.