Quote:
|
Originally Posted by XabbaRus
Well according to the National Academy of Sciences it has never been peer reviewed (by them) and that it was written in the style of a National Academy Proceedings publication.
|
That's because it's not a theory.
The argument being used is like this - I have done extensive work for Microsoft. Gone in, video taped multiple times on their various products, and yeah, I was compensated for it. Using this method of debunking means that any Microsoft article that I post must automatically be wrong because I did a few jobs for them.
That's what I'm seeing and that's BS! That's why i initially laughed at the posts I saw!
I mean from here on out, any computer advice I ever post you better ignore because I helped MS out a few times! Hahahaha!
-S